Bill Clinton had 8 years to rebuild the infrastructure of this country. I guess he was too busy working in the oval office to do anything about the crumbling infrastructure.
2007-08-08 08:46:12 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
No, it is not his fault.
The fault is the state of Minnesota's transportation department for only reading that the bridge was "not likely" to collapse, and disregarding the "one part failure will most likely result in a complete bridge collapse."
2007-08-08 09:03:02 · answer #1 · answered by Scott L 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
If Bill Clinton is responsible for the MN Bridge Collapse then isn't Bush responsible for the deaths of our troops? guess he was too busy taking a walk to do anything about war.
2007-08-08 09:59:45 · answer #2 · answered by Dana 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course. One night Bill was bored so he got his acetyline torch and drove out to Minniapolis when no one was looking and cut through the supports. He's also responsible for the Indonesian Tsunami, Hurricane Katrina and the Flooding of England. WAe haven't got a a reason yet, but I'm sure the NeoConservative media will think of something. Gosh, what will that darn Bill Clinton do next?
P.S. He's also responsible for your lack of intelligence for not contacting your mother and giving her the money for your psycological help
2007-08-08 09:38:09 · answer #3 · answered by Larry A 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Oh , Yeah also the mine collapse , Iraq War, George Bush incompetency, his mentality , his brain having no cells, just whatever happens Bill Clinton caused it, yes indeed. You forgot that whatever happens in the future don't investigate because that old Sex Maniac Bill Clinton caused it all. So look no farther my friend Bill Clinton caused it to happen, yes sirrrreee.
2007-08-08 09:12:29 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Better Bill Clinton be in the Oval Office engaging in adulterous consensual sex like Senator Vitters (in a sleezy motel room)and a host of other filthy monumentally hypocritical holier-than-thou stinking Republicans than the war mongering Bush in the Oval Office waging a vile ILLEGAL war of choice in Iraq that has resulted in the friggin SLAUGHTER of over 400,000 innocent Iraqi civilians .
Bush has had almost SEVEN years to do something about the infra-structure problems but prefers the slaughter of innocent Arabs/Muslims in Iraq.
I am sure that the mother who had to take a pail and shovel to pick up the body parts of her dead child in Bagdad because of Bush's crime against humanity,hoped Bush would have picked up Clinton's non-lethal oral passtime than the war mongering Bush has.
2007-08-08 08:59:53 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Actually, the bridge was supposed to have been repaired but President Bush wanted to spend 450 billion dollars on an illegal war in the middle east...
2007-08-08 10:01:28 · answer #6 · answered by John J 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
thank you for thinking of all of us in this twist of destiny....my be certain's neighbor in no way decrease back residing house from artwork the day earlier in the present day and his kin thinks he could be caught under the bridge in view that he crosses it standard, yet they in all probability won't understand for awhile. it extremely is astounding. i can not even start to think of what the victims and their households have had to circulate by means of. you're an rather candy individual. God bless you
2016-10-14 11:23:45 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, and Bush knew it was going to happen AND that Clinton would get the blame. That's why he's been spending all of our tax money in Iraq.
2007-08-08 08:49:51 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, but look at Bush, who was responsible for 9/11.
2007-08-08 08:57:14 · answer #9 · answered by Sonyja 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I guess he shouldn't have borrowed the surplus in the federal budget for roads and bridges then eh?
2007-08-08 08:48:43 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋