Has anyone considered anyone else? Someone could have framed him???
2007-08-08 08:39:08 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
Who had a motive?
2007-08-08 08:41:59 · answer #1 · answered by dirtyrubberduck 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You know, I followed the case very closely, and I could go on and on about it but there's just too much to cover in this forum. What I will say though, is that if the evidence was so strong, why did the cops feel the need to lie on the stand? Why was the evidence mishandled? Why did Marcia Clark try to change her timeline in her closing statements? Oh, I could go on and on, and I actually couldn't give a damn about OJ, was never a fan or not a fan, I just wanted to see the American justice system work as it should.
And truly, I think it did. When the witnesses, especially COPS that are witnesses lie on the stand, when the chain of evidence is corrupted, when the prosecution changes its story from one day to the next, how can you possibly convict any person in that situation? Did OJ do it? Nobody will ever know for sure, because of the behaviour of the people who were supposed to be presenting evidence that he did. They blew it, and the jury acted entirely appropriately in the situtation.
I do think OJ is scum for abusing his spouse, but in America that alone doesn't convict you of murder, it just means that you're a scumbag. But so are cops who lie on the stand.
2007-08-08 16:13:00 · answer #2 · answered by gilliegrrrl 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
From where did the victims blood come, in his car?
From where did HIS and VICTIMS blood come in his shower drain?
From where did HIS blood come on Goldman's shoe?
Who could have had a motive to kill two people, Goldman being a surprise on the scene, in order to frame OJ?
And the limo driver?
Evidently, you have not, NOT, seen, heard, or read all the testimony. I watched no less than 90-95% of the live BS put on by multi-million dollar attorneys.
2007-08-08 15:54:55 · answer #3 · answered by ed 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
As stated, he was the only person with a motive for murder.
Oh, and was the run from police a frame-up too?
I'm not saying it's possible. I am saying it's about as improbable as could be imagined.
2007-08-08 16:10:50 · answer #4 · answered by Peter D 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm sorry, he did it. Anyone who's been in an abusive relationship know that men like that have the capacity to to commit a crime like that. I will forever blame him for both crime regardless of if it was directly or indirectly.
2007-08-08 15:55:05 · answer #5 · answered by kitty 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The only people more guilty than him are the cops that botched their job letting him walk free.
2007-08-08 16:11:43 · answer #6 · answered by Williamstown 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What I do know is that they are truly ticking me off taking all that man's money .. i mean.. i feel if someone is aquitted they should not be able to be sued for wrongful death.. and its a damn shame they dragging that man thru the mud.. he will never be able to live his life.. they got over 30 million from him .. they took the copywrite priviledges to his book.. i mean.. when will enough be enough
2007-08-08 16:15:59 · answer #7 · answered by cinnamon6121 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
why would they take a risk of the death penalty to frame one man . he had his room mate staying with him read the book
2007-08-09 03:46:37 · answer #8 · answered by dan m 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
With the DNA evidence against him, he should be in jail today. Justice was not served.
2007-08-08 16:21:51 · answer #9 · answered by Herodotus 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋