She is not a progressive, she is a wealthy elite running on status and backed by corporate donors and sponsors. She will not change America, it will only be more of the same. She is not the candidate the Democrats should put forward.
No, I'm not a Republican, nor a conservative. I am fearful that she will take the nomination and ensure a Republican victory in '08. She, like Bush, is a divider, not a uniter.
Clinton getting booed for her positions:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n9FYUHNktlQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yHpG7fBmhaw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YEVrLAkvPi0
2007-08-08 07:40:39 · 13 answers · asked by Frank 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
she is a lot better than the one who is running the country now
2007-08-08 07:45:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
Because Hilary is the best choice. She knows what she is doing. The rest can go own some where. Republicans brought on war. When both Bush's were in there was war. Clinton no war. If people vote for her because of here husband oh well. I like Hilary and I hope Bill is her VP that would be a winning team. She proved she could be a good senator. I know she is up for President.
2007-08-09 02:40:09 · answer #2 · answered by missdiva 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The problem in this country is that people react instead of act. In the case of Hiliary more people are in support of her because they have heard of her before, good or bad. The other candidates are new faces to the general public. True we have been hearing more and more about them which is why we need to wait a little longer to see how long Hiliary's popularity holds. As time goes by and people find out more about the other candidates, opinions will swing. The condition of this country at present is such that I believe if one of Regan's kids ran for office they might stand a better chance than any Democrat, Republican, Independent, etc. Why? Because people will relate Ronald Regan's success to the child. Familiarity.
2007-08-08 15:03:20 · answer #3 · answered by BS_answers 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Are there many supporters? Go check out the comments on her site, or eventful.com, she's LOSING big time. The media is trying to sell her to us, they got this spam that pops up on msnbc.com saying 'wanna convo with Hill inc.'...they favor her. The truth is Obama and Ron Paul are head to head in people's homes. That is the truth. If she has so many supporters and is ahead, why always trying to prove how 'naive' and 'inexperienced' Obama is? Richardson has pics of him with Chavez and Castro on his site...And what about the AFL-CIO debate? She got booed several times.
2007-08-08 16:34:41 · answer #4 · answered by Madalena P 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It takes unmitigated gall to compare any of the Presidential candidates (Republican or Democrat) to George Walker Bush. You have not hid your hate for Hillary very well. Your question is far too transparent.
2007-08-08 14:52:05 · answer #5 · answered by Lettie D 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
The media is owned by the federal reserve bankers and they are controlling this election that is why they only talk about CFR member presidential candidtes.....
Hillary is their first choice it seems, then Barack.
Non CFR members who are really for the people include Gravel, Kucinech and Ron Paul.
Get with it people. Do some serious research and turn off your televisions.
2007-08-08 15:06:30 · answer #6 · answered by Beauty&Brains 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Because she is getting the most attention from the press. I agree with you that she is just like Bush, but the candidate with the most press (good or bad) is the one most likely to win the primary. Most people do not have any idea who is running besides Obama and Clinton, and Clinton is the most familiar name. That's why she is ahead. It sure isn't because of her platforms...she really doesn't have any original ones.
2007-08-08 14:50:29 · answer #7 · answered by Lisa M 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
I think Hillary Clinton supporters are: women who want a woman president, die-hard fans of bill, or misinformed liberals.
You're right, she doesn't represent progress and she will be more of the same. She is the liberal equivalent of Bush, and she will divide the country if not as much as Bush has, then more.
2007-08-08 14:45:46 · answer #8 · answered by Pfo 7 · 5⤊ 3⤋
Hillary is nothing but a neo-con in liberal clothing.
She wants a North American Union and voted for Bush's request to open the borders to illegals.
Most people I know call her "Bush-Lite".
Even Rupert Murdock is supporting her and is currently donating to her campaign.
2007-08-08 14:52:38 · answer #9 · answered by jswnwv 3 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Hillary is Modern Progressive.
She is ready to lead.
2007-08-08 16:56:12 · answer #10 · answered by SpinUpSide 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋