I doubt anyone can make a bad president after going thru the last 7 years.
2007-08-08 04:52:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 6
·
2⤊
5⤋
I can't say that she would be a bad President. I simply see no evidence that she would be particularly good. She has proposed nothing of substance -everything is generality. Shew blew the one occasion she was given to handle health care reform under her husband's administration. She, like Bill, is a terribly disorganized individual who just finds it difficult to move from abstract concept to concrete proposals which are also attractive to the people (congress) who would enact them.
The popularity she enjoys is more a result of celebrity status than political savvy or leadership. Long story short: had there been no Bill, there'd be no Hillary. She is a marvelous tool of the democratic party and a somewhat effective spokesperson for their nebulous agenda; but that's just the thing: she's a TOOL -not a master craftsperson.
At best, I think she would make a mediocre President but at the same time would lengthen the time it would take for people to be less nervous about a woman President. That is to say, if she wins it, she'll be the last one for a long time and will be a big handicap for other very capable women who run for high office. I would be inclined to think that someone of Condoleezza Rice's stature would be a much better choice.
I hope this expresses my mis-givings without violating any of rules you gave.
2007-08-08 06:22:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by JSGeare 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
I think she too willing to give up when things go wrong and not strong enough to go after Ben ladden as the new president must do if we are to have peace no matter wher he is hiding out look at her past record bill clinton did the same thing he had a chance but blew it Carter did too with attacks going on against america so they only way to stop the attack is to kill the leaders of the attacks no matter where thy hide out what canidate runing has the guts to do that
2007-08-08 05:04:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
properly, for the reason that devil is a mythological discern and not actual, then there is no thank you to tell what form of president he'd be. And, for the reason that fantastically plenty *each physique* could be a miles better president than bush, which could recommend that for the period of jerry falwell's (admittedly wacked-out) strategies, bush is a worse president than devil could be besides! Falwell's in basic terms doing what hypocritical, grasping non secular potential nuts like himself continuously do -- attempting to get human beings to do what he needs by scaring them with bedtime memories with regard to the devil. Given his bigoted nature, he'd experience an identical way approximately any lady working for president, despite if she have been the biggest neo-con on the face of the planet. Why does an ignorant, blow-stressful, bigot get such huge exposure in this us of a? Are fundamentalist neo-cons rather that stupid to take heed to this fool?
2016-12-11 14:01:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by fuchser 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I personally do not care for most liberal points of view. I am just very worried that if she is elected that some of Bill's policies and tactics will be put back in play. The more he is in the spotlight with her the more I turn the channel on the television.
2007-08-08 05:03:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by Derek O 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
racketeering using Gov't for personal gain...that is not innuendo..there are enough people out there who have failed to testify..billing records that are lost and then found after Discovery period ends..trading in futures markets with money given to her by a company dependent..upon legislation...money borrowed from DNC chairman to buy their home after the guy makes a windfall on Global Crossing..Enron deals in Bosnia...trades involving hedge funds that receive specal interest status involving tax rates held to 10% on return ..it's all racketeering..and if it was Bush Cheney..and halliburton..would be the mantra of the force-fed ignorant
2007-08-08 05:01:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
i think she'd make a fabulous president but i'm all about health care reform which she and Bill almost had under control before GW came along and flushed every cent we had down the flusher on a needless war. health care is a disaster ......but it doesn't matter to me....i'll be dead soon ...thanks to the fabulous mistreatment i received from the health care in this country....so it really doesn't matter who becomes president. and you can go on and on about hilary and bill.....but i bet none of you have the first clue what they've been doing behind the scenes for the past 8 years while Bush has been killing thousands of americans do you? NB ****WTF does the affair have to do with anything????? Nothing....what president didn't have an affair.......what man doesnt have affairs...please....give that one up.....nothing to do with ****.
I don't think you have anything to worry about......it is evident that if GW can get elected for 2 terms than the American ppl won't pick a decent president next time around. And some of these responses......just look at yourselves....the size of her ***? Come on. Can't you do better than that. I am truly worried that ppl are going to vote democrat just because they hate Bush so much and not vote for the person. It's going to be about the PARTY,,,,NOT the person. Me I like Gulliani best but I don't think he has a snowballs chance in hell. This board is a sampling of voters...and some of the comments are just pathetic.
2007-08-08 04:57:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by bella36 5
·
0⤊
3⤋
In all honesty, I'm scared of what she'll be like, because I don't think SHE even knows. She's been switching her views on various topics just to get votes. So if she DOES win, who knows where she'll actually stand on things. I also don't like the fact that she has socialist views and if she were ever elected, we could give our rights to bear arms goodbye.
Not to mention, you asked if it is because of her gender. Well, sexism goes both ways. I believe there are people who will vote for her just because she IS a woman.
2007-08-08 04:56:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
I feel that she is never constant on any of the issues. She is trying too hard to be popular. You can't be loved by everyone. Some people didn't even like Elvis. She should accept that and be a person of conviction.
2007-08-08 04:58:59
·
answer #9
·
answered by Granny Gruntz 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Sorry but a liar/cheater/thief/murderer CAN"T be a good choice for policy maker, leader, or president.
She changes her story sometimes several times a day. Doesn't anybody notice that?
2007-08-08 04:55:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋