Consider these facts and tell me how we can rule out Iraqi involvment in 9/11.?

Question

-Whatever his beliefs, Sadam portrayed himself as an Islamic fundamentalist to gain support of Arab street. He compared himself to Saladin, called for the return of Israel to Muslim lands, financed Yassar Arafat's intifada, and worked with fundamentalist opponents of the Saudis to undermine support for Gulf War I.

-Sadam never conceded defeat after the first Gulf War,and continued to threaten the US with attacks. Evidence points to Iraqi involvement in 1992 attempted assasination of Bush 1, 1993 WTC bombing, foiled 1993 Un bombing, 1995 Riyadh embasy bombing, 1996 Khobar bombing, 1995 plot to blow up airliners.

-1998-Sadam kicks weapons inspectors out of Iraq, threatens retaliation. Two days later, US embassies are bombed. Al Qaeda claims it is retaliation for US sanctions on Iraq.

-After embassy attacks, press reports that White House considered attacks on Sudan, Afghanistan, and one other(IRAQ). Related documents in national archives are later destroyed by Sandy Berger.

-before the 1990s, all terrorism was found to be state sponsored, not based on "diffuse networks". Al Quaeda and Iraq shared common goals of kicking US out of Saudi Arabia, overthrowing Saudi Regime.

This isn't a conspiracy theory. these facts were reported on by Laurie Mylroie, advisor to Clinton's 1992 campaign, as well as The journal Internationla Strategic Studies. Obviuously there is too much backup info to put here, but the pattern is a much more credible explanation for the 9/11 attacks than "Mulsims are crazy" and "Bush is stupid"

Answer 1

I see that Sadam was unruly, but did he have concrete ties to terrorism? I agree that we can't rule out Iraqi involvement, but we also can't rule out direct involvement by some of our allies in the middle east such as Saudi Arabia and Syria. If we go after Iraq for 9/11, then why don't we go after the country that had 14 of the 19 terrorists from their land, Saudi Arabia.

Answer 2

Well, the people in irag know Saddi boy was more than a little bit paranoid. Paranoid people do not work will with groups they do not control. So I think that if Saddi and Binne were talking to each other it was with swords drawn so to speak. And since we have nothing that points to them ever having been in bed with each other ( trust me it would have been in the Morning breifing if they had anything close to showing them woking together) we would know it. So I think that is all the profit that I need.

Answer 3

If these are facts then where is the source?

And what does any of this have to do with 911?

If you want conspiracy theories there plenty of bizarre conspiracy theories. Even one suggesting the Bushes are behind 911, not any more or less valid than yours.

Answer 4

Muslim extremists were involved with 9/11.
Saddam needed to be taken out.
Osama Bin Laden was and is still a threat to the United States and the rest of the world.

Answer 5

Sorry to say but you've been fooled with that data.
At the end it really doesn't matter if he was anymore. We are in there he is dead and we are not coming out any time soon.
That doesn't mean that Bush is not a liar and a criminal, it just mean no one will prosecute him apparently.

Answer 6

You said evidence points to Iraqi involvment in a lot of terrorist attacks, but never said what the evidence was...I can make general statements too, but without real evidence to back it up it is meaningless.

Answer 7

if he is responsable then bush is the one playing god

one day we will learn the bush white house had there hands all over this

Answer 8

Saddam never portrayed himself as an Islamic fundamentalist...

So right there your question becomes null and void.

Answer 9

You can't rule out anything. The facts tell us that he was not involved. Bush never said he was!

Answer 10

All I care about is that we should have reduced iraq and Iran at one time into burned out cinders and taken over their lands for surplus US citizens and given them jobs pumping oil etc.