I'm really interested in law but I'm really bad at accounting and hate it. I want to be a lawyer in the business sector but is there corporate lawyers who don't have to study accounting?
2007-08-08 04:40:45 · 6 answers · asked by AnswerGirl 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Sorry. All attorneys must understand accounting.
You should take at least a year and preferably two years in college. It is the top discipline for developing logical thinking skills, and in the practice of law you must know how to read financial workpapers and statements, and understand what underlies them.
2007-08-08 04:57:12 · answer #1 · answered by aviophage 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It depends upon what you mean by a "corporate" lawyer. I work for corporations as a litigator, and I am regularly involved in securities, "corporate divorce" contract, and other types of cases, and I don't have a lick of accounting in my background. Now, I DON'T file securities regulation documents, I DON'T do mergers and acquisitions, I DON'T advise businesses on tax consequences. Accounting is pretty important for all of those fields.
2007-08-08 05:05:45 · answer #2 · answered by Perdendosi 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, you do not need it. But, it is good to have a solid business background in college before you go to law school. Accounting is a great discipline. The fact that you hate it is irrelevant. Step up to the plate. If you think accounting is challenging you ain't seen nothing yet. Law school is the ultimate.
2007-08-08 04:45:04 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Not all lawyers who work in a corporation deal with finances -- in fact, often very few on more than a very limited basis.
2007-08-08 07:13:47 · answer #4 · answered by coragryph 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Corporate law more often deals with contracts than accounting.
2007-08-08 04:45:04 · answer #5 · answered by Michael C 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
in case you decide directly to be a company criminal expert, you may attend the suitable regulation college you are able to - Columbia and Berkeley are large possibilities, yet in addition upload others in that variety - to get exposure to the main prestigious corporations that do company regulation. in case you graduate with a 2.7, that's going to be a situation for Columbia and Berkeley. Berkeley is certainly standard for liking larger GPAs. jointly as Columbia is slightly extra versatile there, i does no longer assume to get in with below a three.5 or 3.6 and, if my GPA have been that low, i could desire an surprising LSAT score. 99th percentile and ideally larger in the 99th percentile. luckily, you have some years to elevate your GPA and your 2.7 is in simple terms in reaction to one semester. As for the LSAT score, many regulation colleges in the remarkable 14 (the universities you decide directly to stick to to) strongly weight the LSAT, so it is particularly serious which you do properly. it is too early to earnings, yet once you do start to coach, I propose you bypass the LSAT training as they seem to be a waste of money in many cases. they could help people who're suffering to appreciate even the consumer-friendly recommendations, yet they are actually not particularly standard for bringing people up into the 170s. in case you are able to ruin into the 170s or if that's your objective, attempt self-learn first. for my section, the suitable self-learn supplies are the PowerScore books (good judgment video games, Logical Reasoning, and examining Comprehension) and the certainly assessments. LSAC sells outdated assessments for prepping. you decide directly to apply the latest ones obtainable as they would be maximum representative of the LSAT you will take. confirm you're taking them TIMED, or you're actually not getting the full journey. Take as lots of those as you may get your palms on.
2016-12-30 06:05:17 · answer #6 · answered by hostetter 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋