DNA Computers?

Question

Does anyone know stuff about DNA computers? I have questions. If you know or know someone that know give me your email please. Here is mine.

[e-mail]

Answer 1

I don't know very much, but the basic idea is that binary coding is on/off, while nucleotide coding could be A/G/C/T, so there would be 4 possible codes at each switch instead of just 2. While this is attractive, the information storage, retrieval and processing details would probably be a bear to work out. I'm not holding my breath that the new Intel Nucleum(TM)-based machines will be out any time soon.

Answer 2

I've heard of them but I think quantum computers would be even more advanced than DNA computers.

Note: I know very little about the two but I can't wait till we see early designs of them within the next 20 years or so.

Answer 3

there is not any might desire to assume a god or an "infinitely clever extraterrestrial" (some element that should mean). "no longer something" does no longer and can't extremely exist. there is continually the quantum difficulty, it extremely is as virtually no longer something as is often. yet, it extremely is despite the fact that now no longer somewhat no longer something. It replaced into that technological understand-how ought to no longer respond the question approximately the beginning place the universe or of the huge Bang, despite the fact that that did no longer mean we can might desire to make up an respond (comparable to a god) and say that it was the reason. interior the wonderful few an prolonged time technological understand-how has found out some properly suggestions. there are a number of stable-respected physicists, comparable to Stephen Hawking, Lawrence Krauss, Sean M. Carroll, Victor Stenger, Michio Kaku, Alan Guth, Alex Vilenkin, Robert A.J. Matthews, and Nobel laureate Frank Wilczek, who've created scientific gadgets wherein the huge Bang and for this reason the full universe ought to arise from no longer something despite the fact that a quantum vacuum fluctuation -- by potential of way of classic strategies. In relativity, gravity is unfavourable means, and difficulty and photons are efficient means. using fact unfavourable and efficient means seem to be comparable in absolute finished value, our observable universe seems balanced to the sum of 0. Our universe ought to for this reason have come into existence without violating conservation of mass and means — with the difficulty of the universe condensing out of the efficient means using fact the universe cooled, and gravity built from the unfavourable means. while means condenses into difficulty, comparable aspects of difficulty and antimatter are created — which annihilate each distinctive to style means. despite the fact that there's a average imbalance to the device, which effect in difficulty dominating over antimatter. I know that this would not make sense in our Newtonian enjoy, despite the fact that it easily does interior the realm of quantum mechanics and relativity. As Nobel laureate physicist Richard Feynman wrote, "the assumption of quantum electrodynamics describes nature as absurd from the area of view of classic sense. And it has the comparable opinion thoroughly with test. So I choose you will take delivery of nature as she is — absurd." for further, watch the video on the 1st link - "A Universe From no longer something" by potential of potential of Lawrence Krauss, or get his e-e book (on the 2d link). -

Answer 4

Hey uh, haven't you seen Transformers? They're robots in disguise. They have DNA... and feelings.