I think that's appropriate. Thoughts?
2007-08-08 02:14:17 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
I don't think it would work. The public MIGHT accept a $3 bill as not being phony but we will NEVER accept the idea that Rottenham Clinton is not phony.
2007-08-08 02:38:08 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Queer as a $3 dollar bill! This would be a great question to ask Sen. Clinton at the Koz event.
This idea is wonderful, Asker. Forgive me, everyone else, if this is an OLD question. This was my first time seeing it here in YA!
2007-08-08 09:20:13 · answer #2 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There is no such thing as a $3 bill. With or without the Clinton's. If there were, they would all be phony.
2007-08-08 09:23:20 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
That would be appropriate, but it is more important that we get Ronald Reagan on some denomination of our currency.
Without question, he ranks with the greatest Presidents in our history.
2007-08-08 09:22:42 · answer #4 · answered by the_defiant_kulak 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No.
The Treasure Department doesn't print a $3.
2007-08-08 09:16:29 · answer #5 · answered by Matthew L 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Only if that alien that Hillary likes is on it too.
The one that Weekly World News reported on.
2007-08-08 09:18:21 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Thanks It is hot and I feel sticky and you just made my day. Phoney as a $3 dollar bill you deserve a star
2007-08-08 09:17:20 · answer #7 · answered by devora k 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Sure, and we should also make a $666 bill with Bush and Cheney on it!
2007-08-08 09:16:52 · answer #8 · answered by a kinder, gentler me 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Wow, did you come up with that all by yourself? Because that lame joke hasn't been around for at least a decade.
2007-08-08 09:16:53 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
LOL
2007-08-08 09:17:18 · answer #10 · answered by kys 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋