2007-08-07 22:57:33 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Good question. I get your drift I think. Everything will go wrong with trying to make things go wrong and so it will be all good.
I think here O'Reilly's corollary is important ... two wrongs don't make a right.
2007-08-07 23:06:57 · answer #1 · answered by Quandary 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I see what you mean. Murphy's law is for pessimists who always say - "See, something went wrong again, nothing ever goes right".
But 90% of the time, things do go right, but they don't pay attention to that of course.
So when they walk to the mailbox and get the mail and nothing bad happens, do they credit the Anti-Murphy law? Of course not.
2007-08-08 06:07:10 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Thats why its called Murphy's Law.
2007-08-08 06:02:29 · answer #3 · answered by molly 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If something went wrong with trying to prove it it WOULD prove it!
Oh paradoxes, I love you so.
2007-08-08 06:34:02 · answer #4 · answered by Mordent 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋