English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If the hours that I worked during the 4/29-5/12 pay period I had 40 hours the week of the 4/2h, but only worked 24 hours the week of the 5/6, since I did not work FT hours both weeks charter made the change to PT status effective 4/29 since the change had to occur at the beginning of a pay period. Why could they not have done it mid week or after the second week. Since I worked 40 hours the first week I think that I deserve the status for the week that I was FT I am not getting the benefits that charter promised me. Can someone help me through this to figure something out.

2007-08-07 19:16:48 · 2 answers · asked by tbrock 1 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

2 answers

It is not really a question or law of ethics, but what is the company policy based on specific pay periods. You need to check your employee handbook and check with your manager or Human Resources Consultant.

2007-08-08 01:51:38 · answer #1 · answered by bottleblondemama 7 · 0 0

MABEY

2007-08-08 02:18:19 · answer #2 · answered by ♥crystal♥ 2 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers