Is this a case of reading the polls or can we really not win this war? And if we can't win a war with a 3rd world country who could we win a war against?
2007-08-07 18:44:36 · 11 answers · asked by Guy C.H-Amateur Boxing Historian 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
OMG, thank you for telling me this!!! I didn't realize that she was the ONLY person that voted for this war!!! And now to her she is the ONLY person that wants to pull out of this war!!
And we are still at war?? Are you serious??? I thought when I saw President Bush speaking with the Mission Accomplished banner behind him that we had won the war.
Stop with the crap all ready. She didn't propose this war. It wasn't her fault that there wasn't a solid plan to win this war. OOps, there wasn't suppose to be one I guess.
Look, Bush thought he could just go in, get Saddam, and get out. He thought this was easy. And because of that, we have lost over 3500+ soldiers and it just goes higher day by day.
2007-08-07 20:36:11 · answer #1 · answered by midnight&moonlight'smom 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Our current occupation has nothing to do with Saddam.
Saddam is gone. Out of there. Mission Accomplished.
Even if someone supported going in after Saddam, the question of whether (and how long) we stay is an entirely unrelated issue, because both the factual situation and the goal are entirely unrelated to the original reason for going in.
2007-08-07 18:50:10 · answer #2 · answered by coragryph 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
We are not in a war against a country. We are in a war against Fundamental Islamic Fascism. AkA Terrorism...hello!
2007-08-07 18:48:26 · answer #3 · answered by Em 2 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Well since we seem to be winning the only way the Dems can prosper is by removing the troops before the public sees that we are winning. Simple isn't it.
2007-08-07 18:48:41 · answer #4 · answered by hardwoodrods 6 · 6⤊ 0⤋
Is hillary for or against the war? I still don't really know.
2007-08-07 18:47:10 · answer #5 · answered by - 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Hillary Clinton could be a fish with the amount of flip-flopping she does!
2007-08-07 18:47:54 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Polls.
2007-08-07 18:48:33 · answer #7 · answered by Frank 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It's worse than that.
She supports a "phased withdrawl" that will take "several years".
How is this any different from Bush?
2007-08-07 18:49:12 · answer #8 · answered by askthepizzaguy 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I guess you're point being that Hillary is pandering again. So what's new?
2007-08-07 18:48:01 · answer #9 · answered by Michael M 6 · 5⤊ 0⤋
depends on which way the wind is blowing that day....
2007-08-07 19:57:12 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋