No you are confusing two concepts: a number and a range of numbers (in other words, an interval). Between the numbers 0 and 4 (this is a range of numbers), there are infinitely many different numbers. But the number 4 is exactly 1 number.
If you have 4 apples, you have exactly 4 apples. But you could also say you have at least 3.14159 apples (this is a range. You aren't saying you have 3.14159 apples; you are saying you have *at least* 3.14159 apples) but of course this is ambiguous because now there are infinite number of possibilities.
2007-08-07 19:22:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by Someone Angry 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dont lose your head. 4 is exactly the number you get adding up all your limbs and thats it unless you are handicapped. there are infinite number of fractions because 4 can be divided in to as many small pieces as u like. take an apple and cut it in half and ten cut it again and agin and again and again. now you have infinite fractions with numerator 1. ie. 1/2, 1/4, 1/8, 1/16, 1/32, .............
so dont get mixed up. i think a 5th standard student will explain it better.
2007-08-08 03:42:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by newtonian 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
4 is a finite number because it cannot be anything else, just 4. The reason there are infinite fractions between 0 and 4 (if I understand your question) is because you can divide 4 by 1, 2, 3, and all the partial numbers (like 1.5, 1.3432823, ANYTHING) in between.
2007-08-08 01:28:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by FacePunch 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
4 is a counting number, an integer and a finite number.
Decimals and fractions below 4 could be infinite because of many choices of denominators, numerators, and whole numbers (Like 1/585645465423, 7986/546134850, 3.154687945654, etc.).
2007-08-08 01:34:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by jon_erik_3745 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
It has an infinite number of potential parts, but is finite in length.
That is the paradox of many things: they can be finite and infinite at the same time, but not in the same way.
.
2007-08-08 05:13:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by canx_mp058 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your statement lacks logic. 4 is integral, which has nothing to do with fractions.
2007-08-08 01:23:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by cattbarf 7
·
1⤊
0⤋