NO WHERe!!!! Why are we still there??
2007-08-07 16:45:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
8⤋
To tell you thetruth the weapons of mass destruction are curretnly at home in the US
Not to be biast event though i am middle eastern i am well educated on the topic and the country with the most weapons of mass destruction right now is the U.S.
You know why they make a big fuss about korea and Iran and Iraq is they want a true chance to test and have a real reason to use them because Arizona is already trashed up and now naturalists and environmentalists are getting angry because the radioactive ways are destroying surrounding desert habitats.
2007-08-07 16:49:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
4⤋
There are 15 confirmed incidents of Iraq using WMD
Haij Umran, Iraq
Panjwin, Iraq
Majnoon Island, Iraq
al-Basrah, Iraq / Iran border
Hawizah Marsh, Iraq / Iran border
al-Faw, Iraq / Iran border
Um ar-Rasas, Iraq / Iran border
Sumar/Mehran, Iraq / Iran border
Halabjah Iraq Mustard & nerve agent March 1988 7,000 + Kurdish/Iranian killed
Fish Lake. Iraq / Iran border Mustard & nerve agent May 1988 100s or 1,000s Iranians
Majnoon Islands, Iraq / Iran border
South-central border
an-Najaf - Karbala area Shi’a casualties not known
2007-08-07 17:15:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Of the 500 that have been found in Iraq since 2003, the media hasn't been given the location of the chemical weapons after finding them. Wouldn't want angry democrats to get a hold of them.
2007-08-07 16:46:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
2⤋
do you want a general location, like (distance direction) from the (name) gate of (base) in iraq,
do you want the grid, 10 digit with prefix?
want it on a map or a sketch,
what to know what they called it when the picked it up and shipped it out?
I went in with the invasion in 03.
2007-08-07 16:55:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by magnetic_azimuth 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
North and South Korean leaders are about to have a meeting, so we may soon find out!
Viva la cockroaches!
2007-08-07 16:57:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
He most likely had gotten rid of them or never had them. He did want the world to think he did so they would fear his ordering their use. Its the best of both worlds. Make everyone think you have them so they will be afraid. In truth you don't have them because you didn't really want to pay for the costs of creating and storing them. I'm sure it all seemed like a really good plan until he became so convincing that we had to do something about it.
2007-08-07 16:48:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by ersof59 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
Either buried in the desert of Iraq or shipped into Syria. You can ask the Kurds, oh wait, they're dead. You can see my blog on August 3rd.
2007-08-07 16:48:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by Captain Happy Pants 6
·
4⤊
0⤋
they are walking around all over Iraq strapped with bombs and killing our soldiers, is losing our great soldiers not mass destruction?
2007-08-08 02:10:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well Roz just look down to your left and right. Yeah your arms are in violation of the weapon code.
Ahhh, well it sounded funnier in my head.
2007-08-07 16:46:49
·
answer #10
·
answered by golsen2000 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
Wmd? posted two minutes ago? did you just come out of a comma?
it was an excuse, we didn't want Iraq sending weapons into Afghanistan to support our enemies.
we never considered any negative consequences in Iraq.
2007-08-07 16:48:25
·
answer #11
·
answered by in pain 4
·
3⤊
3⤋