Which Presidential candidate would be the best at bringing both sides of the aisle together? The worst?

Question

Please list the candidates and explain why...

Answer 1

Barack Obama the best because he works well on the Committees with other party members and Kucinich the worst because he is too far to the left. And that's the Democrats. Now, for the Republicans. Guiliana the best because a lot of his views are not Conservative and therefore, it would be easy for him to get along with Democrats and John McCain the worst because he suffers from Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome from being a prisoner of war in Vietnam and is sort of losing it making him stubborn.

Answer 2

You might find this odd, but Hillary Clinton. When she became a senator, she worked very hard in the Senate, and made a lot of compromises between the two sides. Both sides of the aisle respect her.

The worst, I would think would be Barak Obama. Some southerners, to this day, have problems working with African-Americans, and also he's very young and doesn't understand that you have to give a litle take a little.

Answer 3

The assumption would be that it's a good idea to have bipartisanship - and I don't think that's necessarily good. I believe representatives should vote their conscience, not vote their conscience part of the time.

People seem to love the idea in theory, but when put in practice it loses it's luster. Compromise is useful, but compromise means potentially compromising your principles.

It's bipartisanship that got us No Child Left Behind, The Iraq War, and a horrible immigration policy (if you can call it a policy). On both sides of the aisle, the parties need to be predictable so that the voters can be assured they will vote in predictable ways.

Obama and Guilianni would probably be the least obstructive in the Presidential field - but I don't think that necessarily makes them the leader that the country needs at this time. Unfortunately, the alternatives aren't much better.

Answer 4

Democrats - Most likely - Bill Richardson. I think he is the most mainstream of the Democratic candidates. He is for some of the same issues but is willing to temper the ideas so they are more acceptable for all.

Democrats - Least likely - tie between Hillary Clinton and Barak Obama. Clinton carries a lot of baggage with her because of her husband that alienates Republicans. Obama's views are extremely to the left.

Republicans - Most - Rudy Guiliani. Some of his ideas are more closely aligned to the Democrats than to the base of the Republican party.

Republicans - Least - John McCain. I don't see him budging on any of his ideals much the same as George Bush.

Answer 5

On the two element, any candidate who examines the data and logically adjustments his strategies might properly be accused of turn-flopping. Like George Bush Sr interior the Reagan years, case in point. He have been professional-selection interior the 70's, and then took a stable professional-existence stance after. He must be accused of turn-flopping, yet he extremely made a relentless and everlasting replace in his perspectives. there's a distinction between changing your strategies, and only being non-committal and telling human beings what they desire to pay attention. Hillary Clinton replaced her strategies in Iraq (flipped, in case you will), after vote casting for the conflict and helping it as much as a 300 and sixty 5 days in the past. If issues get greater appropriate in Iraq and he or she alters her stance back, she's a turn-flopper pandering to public opinion. i think Clinton and Obama pander a lot to what human beings desire to pay attention. i haven't seen that any of the applicants on the two element have given a lucid sufficient clarification of the subjects yet to be labelled a turn-flopper. John Kerry interior the 2004 election replaced into the textbook occasion, nonetheless.

Answer 6

Both sides of the aisle are bought and paid
for by Corp. America.

so what difference does it make?

How about a candidate that will reinstitute
the US Constitution and keep the oil companies
from getting us into oil based wars?

If you want that...vote Ron Paul

Answer 7

Obama: he has proven that he can do it in the senate, in a very short time. He would bring different cultural backgrounds together too, which serves a bigger purpose in my view.

Hillary: GOP don't like her that much, I remember back in the days when she was running for senate, the GOP voted her the most hated democrat among them

Answer 8

At this point I don't think there is any candidate who could bring together the parties.....
The Dem's are looked upon as weak for trying.

Answer 9

Together - Fred Thompson - his past experience with congress and his ties to both parties as a former congressman. His down to basics policies and strong patriotism. His appeal to calm resolution and strong firm decision making.

Apart - Hillary Clinton - her same old same old policies of putting blame on the other side. Her husband's administration was the greatest wedge in this battle of two parties in our history. Her decisions based on poles and change when they change.

Answer 10

None of them really care what the people want. We really do not have much of a choice do we. All of them are rich and have their own personal agendas so why even ask the question.