I agree that she won't make it and yes, it would be cool, but cool is not an adjective to be used when selecting the leader of the free world.
Qualifications is all that matters in the Oval Office.
Good question.
2007-08-07 15:12:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
In each and every election non-incumbent applicants declare to combat for replace. replace to what? leaping from the frying pan to the hearth is replace yet not an somewhat reliable one. Hillary Clinton has already admitted to her disdain for the 2nd modification, what different factors of the form does she intend to stay away from? bill Clinton allowed Janet Reno to violate the 1st, 2nd, third, and Fourth Amendments to the form. (The third is stressful to violate, yet they controlled). I see no reason to have self assurance that Hillary might do any distinctive. Obama is so a information on the thank you to the left that he makes Hillary look like the president of the NRA. There at the instant are not any reliable selections for President this year. of people who're left, Hillary and Obama are the worst accompanied by using McCain then Romney. Paul and Huckabee are the terrific of the lot yet they aren’t all that super. it ought to be worse i assume, Giuliani ought to nonetheless be interior the working. Thank God he’s long previous.
2016-10-09 11:06:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well. Sorry, Dani. LOL. I think she will. There, I feel like I just stuck out my tongue at you.
It doesn't have to do with it being "cool" to have the first female President, it has to do with the candidate that is best for this country. God save us from people who vote or don't vote for Sen. Clinton simply because she's a woman. I want to see her win, because I believe she is our best candidate. The fact that she is female is a nice aside, but it isn't a reason to cast a vote.
2007-08-07 15:53:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
No more Clinton's. After the stunt that Bill Clinton pulled, or at least the liberal media, to prevent him from getting impeached, I hate them. Remember Sally Hemmings, the Slave that Thomas Jefferson allegedly had children with after his wife died? Bill Clinton was in the process of going through an impeachment hearing and even though it was unproven, the media came out and stated a flat out lie, that dna tests had proven that Thomas Jefferson had children with her. That was never the case. The whole point was to convince people that if Thomas Jefferson slept with his slave then how can we impeach Clinton for for lying to the American people?
It is absolutely disgraceful that one of our founding fathers was besmirched without evidence for a political agenda to protect Bill Clinton, but it happened, and the media never retracted. Come on, people. Thomas Jefferson had one known son, but never reached adulthood, so proving Thomas Jefferson fathered the children of Sally Hemmings is impossible. An all male genealogy from a son that we know is Thomas Jefferson's would have to be compared to a straight male line from Sally Hemmings to show Thomas Jefferson was the father, but on Thomas Jefferson's side there s no descendent to compare to Sally Hemmings' descendents.
Alternately to the convenient version that the media put forth for how Sally Hemmings received white blood, perhaps she was half white, an earlier master for her mother may have passed the blood to her. The point is that there was zero proof to go with the evidence, it was a convenient lie, and they let people believe it even now. I was rather pissed off when I saw that lie restated on the television show 'Sleepy Hollow' as fact.
2014-02-25 18:12:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by Jonathon 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
It would be "cool" to have a woman president, but not a Democrat or Republican. Personally, I'd vote for Adolf Hitler or Usama Bin Laden before I vote for a Democrat or Republican.
2007-08-07 18:37:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
How can you say she won't make it? She is streets ahead in the polls for the Dem nomination and is polling better than any Republican candidate.
There is a long way to go and the job is far from finished but she could not be in a stronger position than she is now.
2007-08-07 15:37:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by Sageandscholar 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
If she was smart, she would reconcile with the Obama camp and try to push that vote... But, like most democrats, they fight too much within their own party... Therefore, I don't see any chance of victory on their side. Whomever the GOP picks to represent them will have a much easier ride... Be it Romney or Thompson or whoever, they stand a better chance of getting along. The big difference between them is the immigration issue, but they don't attack each other over it...
2007-08-07 15:08:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by Jay L 4
·
4⤊
5⤋
I see a future in her running but I don't see a win in her future. I agree with some other folks, there are people who will vote for her because of the "D" after her name and others that will vote for the tiny bumps on her chest. All the rest will find another candidate.
2007-08-07 15:14:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by gimpalomg 7
·
2⤊
6⤋
I see her as a two term president.
2007-08-07 15:14:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by ♥ Cassie ♥ 5
·
4⤊
4⤋
I have to agree with you, I for one don't think she is ready, and I don't think she would be the one we would really want to be the first Female President.
2007-08-07 15:17:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by ♥ ♥Be Happi♥ ♥ 6
·
5⤊
5⤋