When will neo-cons get the memo?
2007-08-07 14:31:14 · 15 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The EX-DEM V1.5 (below) No. Thanks for the words in my mouth though. I AM saying that neo-cons are BAD for the nation and the world because they only allow ONE point of view in their neo-centric world.
2007-08-07 14:37:33 · update #1
Let's see, a black guy with hardly any experience or record to run on, a white woman who's trying to ride her white husbands coattails, also with no experience running anything. This is diversity for the sake of diversity, not because it brings anything to the table. Are these dummies thinking affirmative action should play a part in electing our president? Not one credible candidate with a proven record among them. Maybe you can mention a single concrete accomplishment that shows any one in this bunch of clowns has run anything successfully , like Mitt or Rudy or Mike.
2007-08-07 15:24:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Your party would've (and probably should have) pulled ANYBODY of color off the street to jump into the race to 'prove' your 'PC diversity'. Too bad none of the 'diverse' candidates are qualified for the job. Thank God for affirmative action! The bars been lowered so what you lack in qualifications you get back in race/gender points! Yeah for you. (You do know how incredibly INSANE you libs sound touting race and gender above policy and issues don't you.......well, no--so lets skip that Q ) But hey, why no transgendered candidate? Your party bigoted?
2007-08-07 22:11:08 · answer #2 · answered by Cherie 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Your race and gender is irrelevant. What matters is where you stand on the issues. In the future, America will be proud to have a woman or african-american as president, but Hillary and Barrack Obama are not the right candidates for the job.
2007-08-07 21:54:38 · answer #3 · answered by Dude 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I really do not think this debate, was a true debate in any sense of the word.
The majority of disagreements were personal attacks to the other candidates.
Both the Democratic and Republican debates are simply playing up to their bases, telling them what they want to hear without any challenge.
I personally cannot not wait for the debates after each party has selected their "man" (or woman).
2007-08-07 21:42:00 · answer #4 · answered by Dina W 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I think we are not represented on stage by either side because neither side has too many qualified and competent candidates. I can think of 2 Democrats and 1 Republican I find more competent than the incompetent fool we got in there now. The rest are a joke.
2007-08-07 21:36:31 · answer #5 · answered by The Stylish One 7 · 3⤊ 5⤋
They certainly do represent the best of America.
My party doesn't even have a "front runner," much less a cross section of America. You lucky Democrats. Maybe Hagel will jump in and save the Republican Party, even if he is another white male, at least he is qualified.
2007-08-07 21:41:59 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋
We're back down to 2 genders? I thought we had 5 or 6 at last count. Hillary was on there. Is Bull-Dyke a gender?
2007-08-07 21:38:14 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 4⤋
no it wasnt....the united states should not be run by a man (obama) who lived in idonesia for many years...which is flooded with terriorist...and no...a woman should not be running for president...first of all....bill clinton would be the first lady....and second...a woman cant control an entire nation...let alone voting..women shouldnt even vote...
2007-08-07 22:02:36 · answer #8 · answered by Greg Hicks 1 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Now all we need is a little diversity in ideas.
Conservatives aren't looking for a certain gender or ethnicity, they're looking for someone with the right ideas for the country.
2007-08-07 21:36:11 · answer #9 · answered by Jeff A 5 · 8⤊ 5⤋
nice priorities LOL
2007-08-08 00:08:23 · answer #10 · answered by Augur B 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋