I'm going to try and keep this as generalized as possible so people can answer. Literally...
For those who scream and squak that there is/was a conspiracy and/or cover-up...where exactly do you come up with these assumptions?
If I told you, which I'm going to, that you CAN NOT claim proof/evidence/facts based on any medium including but not limited to youtube, conspiracy theorists movies, conspiracy theorists websites and/or idle chat among other conspiracy theorists...
Can and/or will you still claim that there's a conspiracy/cover up that our current administration had presiding over 9/11?
And if so, what evidence or proof do YOU have with the options listed above being unusable to support your claim?
2007-08-07
14:21:06
·
11 answers
·
asked by
Glen B
6
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics
Remember, opinions don't count. Prove to me and the rest of the world with facts/evidence/proof.
2007-08-07
14:23:00 ·
update #1
Yes, if you provide me with links I will look at them. Remember, if they relate to conspiracy theorists you'll have violated the proper ways of proving such accusations.
2007-08-07
14:32:55 ·
update #2
Email(below); That's exactly the point, how can YOU prove it. Without these websites and other media outlets spewing this garbage, can you honestly say you'd believe it? For that matter, would one even exist?
2007-08-07
14:38:29 ·
update #3
Email(below); Look at the stipulations placed on uncovering the so called "truth." You've failed to answer my question.
2007-08-07
14:46:01 ·
update #4
Dr. Trevor; What does that prove to me when it comes to answering the question. You've failed, too. Try again.
2007-08-07
14:49:40 ·
update #5
Mark; you failed to provide any support to your claim. You failed to answer the question.
2007-08-08
12:14:38 ·
update #6
Who "pulled" WTC 7, and why?
2007-08-07 14:48:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by Dr. Trevor 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
I think that the USA has got several very serious problems right now
* partisan politics approaching a second Civil War
* conspiracy theorists
* some theories of economics which could place the nation at risk of not being able to defend itself
What I eman by # 1 above is that the Democrats and Republicans are more interested in bashing each other than in taking actions that are in the best interests of the nation. Each President wants to be seen as not accepting any good stuff done by the previous party, so any good stuff done by prior party administration is to be trashed. It does not matter who winds election, the people who favor the other side, will do whatever they can to undermine the winner.
What I mean by the # 3 above is that unregulated free trade, off-shore outshoring is an economic theory. If it works, great. If not, then the nation might find that its military id dependent on products made by other nations, that if they went to war with us could embargo what is essential to our survival.
Many people are literate and intelligent, and got a copy of the 9/11 commission report, studied it, understood that there are some topics where you have to be some kind of an expert to understand all the details, and when a nation is at war the government cannot tell us everything. We want government to work properly, and we want systems to fix government when it does not work satisfactorily.
Unfortunately there are people who, if they do not understand something, do not believe in trying to find experts or teachers, or reference books to help them understand the subject. We call some of those people illiterate, gullible.
Around the same time that the Minnesota bridge collapsed, there was an overpass in California that collapsed, Apparently a tanker truck caught on fire, and this caused the steel underneath the concrete to melt. Well according to some 9/11 conspiracy theorists the buring fuel from the hijacked planes could not possibly generate enough heat to demolish the steel of which the World Ttrade towers were built, so someone must have planted explosives to cause the buildings to be demolished. If they are correct (and I do not blieve them for a minute), then that means that the overpass in California was brought down by some conspiracy.
There have been times in the past that the government has deceived the people. There are people who believe the government does that all the time.
I believe the government is composed of ordinary people, who make ordinary mistakes.
2007-08-07 14:52:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
It's just nothing more than typical conspiracy that often pop up after such dramatic event.
http://usinfo.state.gov/media/misinformation.html
I don't see how people can do better than official investigation with eye ball estimates and bunch of internet pictures.
2007-08-09 18:25:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
This is just a way to help some people feel that in being it was our fault or that someone in the Bush administration
knew it was going to happen that we had some sort of control over what happened that day. Just as they said we knew about Peal Harbor before hand. It's simply a physiological
response to the helpless, 'not in control' feelings we all felt.
2007-08-07 14:35:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
The only conspiracy on 9/11 was the one hatched by Osama Bin Ladin!
2007-08-07 14:24:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by texasjewboy12 6
·
5⤊
2⤋
Jet fuel fire can't melt steel. Trade tower 7 collapsed due to fire on the roof, alledgedly.
Show me a picture of a plane hitting the petagon, and I'll believe it.
2007-08-08 00:54:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by Mark Twine 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
I rejected 9-11 conspiracy theories until I started listening to the truth about it. I can list a whole bunch of web sites, are you going to read them or watch them?
How can I post anything not related to a conspiracy when that is exactly what we're talking about?
http://www.loosechange911.com/
http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com/
http://www.911truth.org/
I did not want to believe it. I totally rejected it until I gave these theories a chance. I'm actively looking into debunking articles as well.
2007-08-07 14:29:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 6
·
4⤊
3⤋
Thank you for writing this in a matter most people will understand.
The conspiracy is the dumbest thing I have heard in the last six years what a bunch of talking heads.
2007-08-07 14:40:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by kim t 7
·
3⤊
3⤋
Glen
It takes all kinds to make the world go round. You are looking at these people like they might be credible. Look at it like I do. To me, they are just another source of entertainment. If you laugh at them, it will not bother you as much.
2007-08-07 14:48:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by nana4dakids 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
No one can dispute this since there is absolutely no evidence of a conspiracy or cover-up.
2007-08-07 14:32:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
i don't see how anyone can still claim after so many years of no proof that the conspiracy still exist
2007-08-07 14:36:22
·
answer #11
·
answered by tgatecrasher2003 3
·
2⤊
2⤋