English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

14 answers

At the very least, their salaries and pensions should be tied to their performance and the performance of the corporation or company that they run.
It's absolutely insane when a CEO gets canned because the company is doing squat - and he receives a multi-million dollar severance package.
The workers' pensions should be mandated by law to receive an independent audit at least annually to assure the money isn't building someone a nice hunting cabin in the Ozark Mountains. What took place at Enron and World Com is disgraceful.
Outrageous !

2007-08-07 14:03:04 · answer #1 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 3 0

How about we get our fingers out of privately held and owned businesses and let them do exactly as they please. If you work for company X and don't like the pension plan, leave and get a better job. Be greatful to get a pension at all.

I am self-employed and will never get such perks, therefore, I plan for myself the way I will need it.

Who can explain the logic behind asking a question like why CEO's pensions should be tied to the worker's pensions?

If you want CEO perks, become a CEO!

2007-08-07 21:11:58 · answer #2 · answered by Al S 3 · 0 0

Interesting thought, but probably not a good idea. If a company isn't willing to pay its CEO very much money, then it won't be able to get a good CEO. And that'll end up hurting the low level workers a lot more than a high CEO salary would have.

2007-08-07 22:50:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I agree. Pensions.

But although I believe that American CEO's get to many bonuses for way to much money. I do believe that they should be compensated if the are moving their company in the right direction and the company is making a profit.

2007-08-07 20:56:49 · answer #4 · answered by Dina W 6 · 1 0

I agree fully because I, for one, am tired of CEOs causing the downfall of a company and still getting paid millions of dollars while the average person loses everything (pension, job) and has to try to claw their way back up.

2007-08-07 21:08:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

CEO's shouldn't get pensions. They get paid more in one year than the workers do in a lifetime, so they should pay their own way after they leave the company.

2007-08-07 21:05:41 · answer #6 · answered by ♥ Cassie ♥ 5 · 2 1

I don't necessarily. Now, take the Enron scandal. Those pensions all those people lost should be paid by the CEO's and CFO's of that company.

2007-08-07 20:54:51 · answer #7 · answered by Glen B 6 · 4 0

It should definitely be tied to the worker's salaries. It should be no more than 4 times the amount of the average of all employees.

We need to stop the Corporate Aristocracy!

2007-08-07 20:57:08 · answer #8 · answered by B. D Mac 6 · 4 0

Absolutely

2007-08-07 21:16:52 · answer #9 · answered by Jackie Oh! 7 · 0 0

Not an issue anymore. Few companies have pensions, just 401k's.

2007-08-07 21:03:58 · answer #10 · answered by beren 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers