why does the government say socialized medicine is bad?

Question

that new bill that congress just passed helps lower income children (and yes maybe also some of their parents) those who voted against it say that this is a step towards government run healthcare- why is that bad? why do they pretend they would not be good to run it?

Answer 1

The influence of lobbyists.

Answer 2

definite, they are government run socialized drugs. i could desire to work out them phased out, yet using fact they have been around see you later and human beings count on them, it does no longer be appropriate to easily get rid of them thoroughly appropriate away. it may help if we had genuine tax reform. If the government wasn't stealing our money earlier shall we pay for needs, we does no longer desire those courses. Phasing them out could cut back the dimensions and value of investment the federal government, which might cut back the quantity of taxes they might constitutionally confiscate from us. Tax reform NOW!!! Repeal the sixteenth modification and bypass the honest Tax(H.R.25) The Reverend Mistydawne- The issues you record are issues that should/ might desire to be dealt with by potential of state and native governments or the persons. there's a distinction between the federal government and state and native governments. Take a gander on the form. that should grant you a clue regarding the powers of the federal government and the powers of the states and the persons. while human beings say they do no longer desire nationalized wellbeing care, they mean the federal government should not be working wellbeing care. IF guy or woman states desire to grant some style of public wellbeing care, it extremely is as much as them. something human beings should not be compelled to connect or fund it.

Answer 3

The government you are talking about is "owned" by special interest groups, like Insurance companies, drug companies, etc. They just like AMA have spent millions on dis-information and propaganda to protect their billion dollar profits. The argument that who would you rather have making your medical decisions a Dr. or the government?! Doctors cannot make your medical decisions now, they have to be pre-approved by your Insurance Co. and they are famous for refusing coverage for so many bogus reasons that you might as well not have insurance at all! I do not have medical insurance because I am self-employed but I know many others who either cannot afford it or have a "reason" why no one will insure them at any price! Everyone should be able to get medical care and my Canadian friends have no problems with their care. In fact they are amazed by our situation here in the "land of the rich".

Answer 4

The government actually loves the idea of socialized medicine. It will bring in huge amounts of cash for them to blow on unrelated programs just like they do with our social security money. Socialized medicine will require huge tax increases while providing less medical care than most of us have now. What is not to like about that, if you are a democrat or republican big spender, big taxer, big government, politician? But some can't admit it right now with the elections coming.

Answer 5

The U.S.A. has 800,000 doctors .A hospital in every town.Social med would work here,but the DOCTORS and lawyers would not make the fortunes that they now can.
Mayo Clinic in MIN. works on a system similar to Social MED. The Doctors are paid very good by the hospital ,with great benefits.They also have all their insurance paid by the hospital and especially Mal-practice.The doctors also do not have Private practices of their own, that is how well compensated they are .What you hear is all B.S. to discourage you.
Mayo Clinic also processes about 4,000 patients evey day. CK it out.

Answer 6

Because socialized medicine would help the lowly citizen, the working people making 35K to 50K per year.
When Dad is 65 and Mom is 60 dad could retire and not have to worry about health care for his wife, see I know a man that wanted to do just that but his wife was very sick, so he had to work until he was 70 to keep health insurance on his wife until she reached 65, he died at work 1 week before his wife turned 65. So you see if we had socialized medicine we would be to free. So it would be harder for the government, employers and insurance companies to dictate our lives. People who say it would be bad are the people that are afraid they will lose some status or their convenience store health care.

Answer 7

That bill was made to be very expensive on purpose because they wanted George Bush to veto it. Then they can say that Bush hates children and doesn't want them to have healthcare.

Answer 8

It's not bad; it's great.

Maybe they're against it because it means they would actually have to do some work to earn their incomes, for a change. Maybe because socialized medicine would leave less money for things like, I don't know, starting wars? Maybe because if they brought in socialized medicine, voters would insist that they also focus on improving things like, infrastructure? Maybe because they'd have to actually "govern".

Who knows why anyone would oppose anything that would improve the lives of the most disadvantaged citizens of a country.

Answer 9

Ask Canadians.

Answer 10

Nothing government does runs efficiently, most of there programs are in the red and plus costs incurred per American would be disproportioned to the usage

Answer 11

Because the health care lobby pays them to say that.