English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

wich one is more dangerouse?nuclear Iran or attacked Iran?

2007-08-07 12:23:24 · 6 answers · asked by march_girl666 2 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

6 answers

the most dangerous is having war with each other. either nuclear or going on invasion or simply just attacking.
i feel that war is wrong. having war does not solve problems.
in fact, it creates more trouble and hatred between mankind.
and what not, more lives will be killed not only the military
but also, those who are innocents like the civilians.
if i were given a wish, my only wish is not to have war. though you know you wont see that coming.

rather than having this government to spend large money on building weapons and spending on it. why not spend it on those who needs it more? the poor always needs help. we as mankind should help each other out. not simply by killing one another. i know i may be talking bullcrap but this is my personal opinion.

peace.

2007-08-07 12:36:37 · answer #1 · answered by young sponge 1 · 1 1

A nuclear Iran is certainly dangerous. However, I believe the general populace does not want war with the West.

I believe we should continue to apply diplomatic pressure while simultaneously using covert op’s to instigate an uprising by the Iranian people who will subsequently either vote the radicals out or kill them and replace them with more moderate secular leaders.

I think this should continue until there is no other option and if/when zero hour comes (i.e. production of intercontinental or even medium-long range nuclear weapons) we bomb their leaders’ positions and their nuclear facilities/weapons plants.


Edit: by general populace I refer to the Iranian general populace.

2007-08-07 19:38:25 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

As long as we are engaged in wars in Afghanistan and Iraq we do not have the troops and/or equipment to launch another large scale invasion. Plus Iran would b e a very formidable foe considering our current over extended military.

2007-08-07 20:53:15 · answer #3 · answered by ndmagicman 7 · 0 0

Just one more country to invade...Iraq will surely be more secure if we occupied Iran. Then Syria will become a danger. Iran will be more secure if we invade Syria. Lebonan's got it coming, too. Let's just attack and occupy the whole Middle East! Iran is more dangerous than NKorea. NKorea's single leader worships himself too much to allow himself to be atomized by a retalitory nuke.

2007-08-07 19:38:05 · answer #4 · answered by St. Toad 4 · 0 0

I honestly don't know.

But I DO know this: if we do go to war with Iran, the Democrats Will Support Iran.

The Democrats may Encourage us to go to War, but they will ALWAYS end up Betraying us, and Supporting our Enemies.

2007-08-07 19:36:24 · answer #5 · answered by wolf 6 · 2 1

no, america does not attack those that can fight back.

2007-08-07 19:47:31 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers