Would it be weird to put the baby's date of birth? or should I put just there name?
2007-08-07 12:03:31 · 11 answers · asked by JESSICA 2 in Pregnancy & Parenting ➔ Newborn & Baby
Baby foot prints.
2007-08-07 12:32:51 · update #1
I don't have a name yet. I don't know if its a boy or girl and I haven't been able to decide yet.
2007-08-07 12:34:15 · update #2
i'm a tattoo artist and in my shop we think it's bad luck to put the birth date because you never want it to have an end date. but if it's important to you i would put the date because it is no ones tattoo but your own. you might want to consider putting an image with the name instead, something that represents the love you feel.
2007-08-07 12:21:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
I would put the birth date. I plan on doing this when I am done having kids. My son was born in 2004 (will be 3 on Friday) and last year, the day after my son's 2nd birthday, my husband and I lost a baby girl at 21 weeks and I want a tattoo with her name too. If you are breastfeeding I would wait until you are done, just in case you get an infection, even though the risk is low, it isn't worth it.
2007-08-07 12:16:32 · answer #2 · answered by Ryan's mom 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have inspiration approximately it, I have a buddy who did his sons names down his fingers and it appears rather cool. I love tattoos and I suppose that I might get a tattoo of my youngster's title. I suppose I might do some thing rather sensible and some thing that I can conceal if I decide upon to. I have 2 tattoos now however either one of them are simply hidden for while I am at paintings.
2016-09-05 11:02:34 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am planning on getting my son's name and birth date around my wrist in a very elaborate script. My boyfriend is going to get his foot print and birth date tattooed as well.
2007-08-07 13:42:45 · answer #4 · answered by Dani 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Instead of just the name, why not the tiny foot prints as well? My sis has it and it's cool. name first over the actual footprints with the date under.
2007-08-07 12:09:59 · answer #5 · answered by cora m 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't think it would be wierd, you may want to explain where you are getting it and how big it is so people can give a better opinion. But no, not tacky at all in my opinion! Congrats on the baby!
2007-08-07 12:08:20 · answer #6 · answered by Kristen 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i'd do the birth date too
whats the name are u getting a cool design or pic to go with it ??????
2007-08-07 12:07:55 · answer #7 · answered by Tink 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why would it be weird to put the birth date? I know plenty of people that have done this. Strange you would think it to be weird.
2007-08-07 12:09:21 · answer #8 · answered by West Aussie Chick 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Another cute idea is to get it in the color of the baby's birthstone.
2007-08-07 12:57:20 · answer #9 · answered by berrel 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
wouldn't it kinda look like it was an "in memory" tattoo of someone who has passed on? It seems like those have dates on them - but it's your tattoo and your kid so who cares what other people think.
2007-08-07 12:17:09 · answer #10 · answered by JustMyOpinion 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋