First she says she would like to keep troops in then she looks like she wants to pull out she changes her mind like every four weeks?
2007-08-07 11:54:47 · 22 answers · asked by Jeremy P 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
In the Democratic debate she clearly stated that she will end the war and pull the troops out of Iraq within 100 days in office if she becomes president.
Edit: You people need to watch the debates. Those words came out her mouth.
2007-08-07 12:04:28 · answer #1 · answered by Liberal City 6 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Last I heard she wants to Cut and Run from Iraq and throw our troops in the middle of the Civil War in Darfur.
2007-08-07 12:57:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
She doesn't have a stance, per say. Her next move is to change her mind again, and NOT tell the American people why she will continue the war in Iraq (because she will, if elected). MONEY. War makes money, and that is the reason she will want to stay in the war. Geez folks, wake up. Does anyone really believe Liberals want to bring our troops home for their safety? LOL, when has a Liberal ever cared about you? If there was ever a time any elected official personally cared about what you thought, let me know.
At least George Bush gave us fair warning that we would not differentiate between terrorists and those who harbor them, didn't he? He has kept his promise. Some people in Iraq are harboring terrorists, now aren't they? It makes no difference what country we fight in, only that said country is harboring the terrorists we are fighting against. That is the mission, that is the war. A war on terrorism, not a war for money, or profit.
2007-08-07 12:06:15 · answer #3 · answered by xenypoo 7 · 6⤊ 3⤋
absolutely everyone that voted to authorize this administration to apply rigidity, and then later found out that they had in simple terms surpassed a loaded gun to a guy with the psychological ability of a three year-old could be allowed to recant. distinctive them have been doing what they concept replaced into outstanding on the time, and have been status at the back of the president. that's what they have been accused time and time back of not doing ever considering. of their protection, none of them ought to've well-known how badly he might f**ok it up (nicely, it feels like Barak Obama had some concept).
2016-10-09 10:49:43 · answer #4 · answered by ismail 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Hillary plan for Iraq:
1.Cut
2.Run
2007-08-07 11:59:37 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 3⤋
Her stance is she doesn't have a stance seriously. First she voted for it and siad some harsh words about Saddaam and I quote, "Saddaam poses a clear and present danger to the world today," and now she can't decide. She hasn't openly said we shoud leave but she hasn't said we should stay and she has condemned the war as criminal and illegal but then she backs down from those statements. She doesn't have one and until the election she probably won't.
2007-08-07 11:59:11 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 2⤋
It depends on who the audience is. She knows we cannot leave immediately, but she will politicize this. I will enjoy all those commercials in 2008 that show her vacillating positions.
2007-08-07 12:38:42 · answer #7 · answered by GOPneedsarealconservative 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
she ws talking about not ruling out the possibility of using nukes, in some situations, maybe not in this war, but it's still quite out of character, maybe she is another flip flopper.
2007-08-07 14:10:45 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Clinton's are in with the Bilderberg Group so that's a 'go'.
2007-08-07 12:12:10 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Hillary's stance on the Iraq war,.....depends on what year it is, what day it is, what time it is,.....she tells the people what she thinks they want to hear,.....
2007-08-07 11:59:42 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 2⤋