Are the Bushes more dangerous than Saddam Hussein?

Question

or is it just me and my anti-death and , anti-war ways

Bushes, missles and family homes too, don't forget.

Answer 1

For those who love peace, the Bushes is dangerous since they are still aggressive with war even when Saddam Hussien was already dead.

Answer 2

We voted him in, we went with the war, we cowed down like we always do in a fight an forgot how to back each other up, why is it Bush Bush Bush, its us us us we cant see nothing through. The man had a vision, a back bone.There is still 5 TONS of anthrax out there an no one knows how much mustard gas , the U.N even said as much, oh how we all forget.the extremist will continue to grow an some day will strike with a vengeance, where will you be? the road map, had to start somewhere, why not Iraq? Saddam was the most feared in the region, take the big boys out first.,,,, somehow you have to get the extremist to start rethinking that us westerners must die,, got any ideas? I dont either,,,,,,,, some day you people will say, wowwww. man we should've stayed UNITED ,,, but we cowed........ cry me a river. sry,,, you gave the means to vent, i did, and got two points, thx

Answer 3

ask all the families that are victims of Saddam, osama, and all their followers. just because Saddam is dead, does not mean we are safe, and just because obl is still rotting in his cave, does not mean that his followers are not plotting something else against America. i can not say that i totally agree with bush sending all our troops to their untimely deaths, but at the same time, what are we suppose to do. NOTHING!!!!! just keep letting this horrible man take out our fellow Americans does not seem like the answer either.( osama that is) if you ask me, i think they are all a danger to our future and our children's.

Answer 4

Saddam Hussein was a puppet to the Bushes, who are incidentally controlled by the Illuminati, who are YES! more dangerous than anyone on this planet.

Answer 5

Considering Saddam is dead......I would say the Bushes might be up there with some of the most dangerous people on the planet.

Answer 6

Not in a direct way but our whole system of government has become so dangerous that in the long run, yes. There is the distinct possibility that sooner, rather than later, we could vote a very dangerous megalomaniac into office that could be even more dangerous than Bush. There's a storm coming, folks, and it has nothing to do with global warming.

Answer 7

It is just you. You might recall the chemical warfare that your friend used on the Kurds. Oh yes and remember on the news when they were showing Saddam leveling the Kurds houses. No wait that was not on the news was it. Well you saw it while you were there. So you are right Saddam was not a bad guy.

Answer 8

Of course the Bushes are more dangerous. Saddam didn't have nukes and what little WMDs he had in the first gulf war were effective on small populations. He didn't have the power then to defeat anyone his own size. After Bush Sr. did a number on him he weakened even more so that by 2003 his regime was beginning to crumble and he was little threat to anyone outside his own country.

Bush is the head of the most powerful nation ever to exist on earth. I think the comparison is clear.

Answer 9

Unless they start gassing blue states and raping 8-year old girls, and throwing political opponents into pits with starving, savage dogs, I would say no.

Always best to read up for yourself. You cannot do enough reading, my young 8-year old friend!

Answer 10

Its the whole government [ both party's] not just bush