Giulliani agreed with Obama, didn't he?

Question

Obama said that he would go into Pakistan, with or without Musharraf's permission, if he had "actionable intelligence" that
Al-Qaida targets were there. Giulliani said that he wouldn't have worded it the way Obama did, but he would do the same thing.
Why is the media making such a big deal about Mitt Romney
attacking Obama for the comment and not saying a thing about the fact that Giulliani agreed with Obama's comment? Isn't Giulliani supposed to be the Republican standard bearer for the war on terror?

Answer 1

Obama and Giuliani are both interested in entering Pakistan according to their political stands because they wanted to have aggressive foreign policies.

VOTE for your choice as US President on my 360 degrees blog and know who will likely win.

Answer 2

More like Obama agrees with Giuliani. Obama at this point is either showing true colors, or is changing his position to try to close a 16-point gap between him and Mrs. Bill "I did not sleep with that woman" Clinton.

I loved his words, to be honest, especially since it came from a candidate who claims to have opposed the Iraq War from the start. Obama does a complete 180 and now looks more like a very inexperienced hawk.

Too bad the DNC is not smart enough to give the DNC nomination to a candidate who advocates an aggressive foreign policy. Unfortunately, even that is not very good policy since Musharraf is a key ally in The War on Terror and Obama's policy would only alienate us further. Al Qaeda has tried to assassinate Musharraf too, so he shares the heat with us and has no love for bin Laden.

Answer 3

Guilliani and Obama am still not clear what those two guy's stand for. Guilliani being saying that is just shock a democrats would say something like that because that's sound like Obama ready to battle and most democrats does not sound like that.

Answer 4

maybe he can be obama's vice president.