In the past 3 months there were some facts and reasonable debates about the circumstances surrounding the disappearance of Madeleine.
1) They have left the children alone- Legitimate debate
2) Fund and conduct of the publicity campaign- Legitimate debates
They were reasonable debates because there were some facts, and we were discussing the rights and wrongs of their actions.
Things have changed in the past few days, and unfortunately this category has lost its purpose.
We, the public, don’t condemn victims of crime without evidence, let alone trial.
We don’t know whether Madeleine was abducted or murdered in the apartment, and even if she was murdered in the apartment we don’t know who the culprits are.
So I urge you to keep this debate reasonable and civil.
Ta
2007-08-07
10:18:10
·
17 answers
·
asked by
toietmoi
6
in
News & Events
➔ Current Events
Ok toilet.
2007-08-07 10:21:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
11⤋
Garden you are very abusive tonight. You can not treat people like that. If a question doesn't interest you it is better if you did not answer. I have reported you cos this can't go on.
_______________
That was a very good question you asked. The whole thing is getting tiring and no one really knows the truth yet. We will just have to wait and see what happens. Every day brings a different twist and turn in it. Lets see what happens as the story unfolds.
2007-08-07 17:30:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by Black 7
·
7⤊
1⤋
I agree, but 1) Neglect
2) Pact Of Silence
3) Limited Company
4) Legal Team
Why can't the McCanns offer a reasonable explanation as to why any of these measures have been taken.
I so hope that Madeleine is safe and well, but most people would query these manouvres by the McCanns. These are NOT normal steps when a child goes missing.
2007-08-07 17:27:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by Ysanne 5
·
2⤊
5⤋
I agree with you toietmoi - but as barbie says - what about Murat? At present, I'm not even speculating whether the blood is Madeleine's or not. I've said plenty about the McC's - but I've never actually said they murdered her. Responsible for anything that's happened to her, yes - but that's two different things.
2007-08-07 19:05:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by M'SMA 5
·
3⤊
2⤋
Fare enough but why does the McCann's and their friends stories keep changing all the time.
2007-08-15 06:54:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by redshoes805 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I wholeheartedly agree with you and well done to you for putting it so well. It is just such a shame that your words of wisdom will be wasted on some low intelligence people who love a good witch hunt.
2007-08-07 18:53:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by bumbleboi 6
·
4⤊
1⤋
At last, someone talking sense. I'm not pro or anti McCann, I just wish there could be an end to this whole story. I believe in innocent until proven guilty and that goes for Kate, Gerry and Robert Murat, we don't know what has happened and speculation isn't helping anyone.
2007-08-07 17:23:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by claire s 3
·
6⤊
4⤋
toeimoi. sorry about spelling.
you cannot reason with these people
they have decided
end of story
there is no evidence as yet.
i try to be reasonable but i must confess to getting angry. accusing fingers are pointed at the mccanns. no evidence is provided to back up the accusations except that shambo saw it somewhere. dave s is almost human compared to shambo.
2007-08-07 18:07:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by kati 6
·
5⤊
2⤋
there is nothing reasonable or civil about a missing child
it is the hype and money involved and the don't know factor
that leads to condemnation
sure we should not judge. but we all do its human instinct
as you have just proved
2007-08-07 17:40:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by Jezabel 6
·
3⤊
3⤋
I have been reasonable and civil
I am not jumping to any conclusion toietmoi
If this is your stance (and I agree with you) what about murat's trial by media?
2007-08-07 17:22:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
4⤋
So why did this not apply to mr murat and his family? Was he condemned without evidence?
2007-08-07 17:26:27
·
answer #11
·
answered by sammie 6
·
4⤊
4⤋