English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I had a friend who is not my friend anymore take her wedding rings off at my bacholorette party and pretend that she was not married and didn't have a family all night long, she was also making out with guys and groping and stuff. So here is my question, would you ever take your wedding rings off and pretend you weren't married for free drinks? Also she told me that her husband said it was okay to take off her rings and that it was his suggestion. So my other question, do you know any guy that would tell his wife its OK to take off her wedding rings and makeout with other guys to get free drinks? I don't, its called honoring your husband, right? As far as Im concerned guys are pretty possessive of their women and I don't know a single guy that would tell their wives to do that. What do you think?

2007-08-07 09:56:53 · 18 answers · asked by kimandandyjennings 2 in Family & Relationships Marriage & Divorce

18 answers

As much as I would love free drinks, that is a condition I cannot abide by, so I will pass

2007-08-07 10:02:54 · answer #1 · answered by Experto Credo 7 · 1 0

Unless she and her man have an open relationship or some situation where fooling around (but no sex) is okay, then I'd say what she did constituted cheating.

Making out for the purpose having a guy buy you a drink or few is a form of prostitution actually...

2007-08-07 10:03:59 · answer #2 · answered by . 7 · 2 0

I've known two such couples - saw them both in counseling for other issues. They were remarkably shallow and self-serving.
One of the couples ran into one of the great dangers of such behavior - the wife pulled her little trick once too often, and when the men in the group she was with realized what she was doing, she was plied with drink until helpless, raped repeatedly and finally beaten to a pulp. She was severely disfigured and committed suicide three years later. All because she and hubby thought it was kewl to play other men for fools.

2007-08-07 10:49:38 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

There are all different kinds of people out there. It's not completely out of the realm of possibility that they have an open relatoinship where this sort of thing is okay. You probably know her and her husband better than anybody on here to judge if this okay or not. But, there are people who have open relationships like this.

2007-08-07 10:03:03 · answer #4 · answered by JC 2 · 0 0

vegetation tend to be high priced, and silk/pretend vegetation won't be from now on reasonable so that's extremely useful to check out that further. What approximately ceremony song? i spotted this wasn't on your calculations. (except you intend on using your reception DJ for the ceremony besides. are you able to even try this?) do not attempt to discover a photographer extra reasonable than $a million,000. The adage, "you get what you pay for" will probable come real. (not plenty for acquaintances and relatives providing you with a chit...in simple terms that interior the expert international, while you're paying pennies you're in simple terms getting that plenty product.) At 70 people your cost continues to be going to be around $a million,2 hundred with the service fee. That seems to me like an excellent cost. optimistically you have figured your numbers on the severe area so which you don't get a ask your self on the top. Officiants might nicely be somewhat inexpensive; in the journey that your buddy's grandmother won't or can not do it seek for a existence like JP. additionally bear in recommendations which you're able to purchase your attendants presents and you're able to probable incorporate your pals who would be 'working' at your wedding ceremony in this selection. does not could be each and every of an identical, and it does not could be high priced, yet continuously provide a small token of appreciation and a hand-written, heart-felt thank you to each. ETA: i did not recommend to assert your pals does not do an excellent job! I in simple terms meant that in the event that they at the instant are not 'experts' and you attempt to get somebody to do it at that (staggering) cost, maximum possibly it won't come out as reliable as you wish.

2016-10-09 10:38:51 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

A cold day I'd tell my wife she could take it off -- nor do I
take mine off. It's a cheap cop out to a deep commitment.
The ring announces to the world that you're unavailable and
content with that arrangement.

2007-08-07 10:06:05 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Hey, she was not exactly getting her drinks free. She had to put up with groping.
Sounds like the happy couple belong together.

2007-08-07 10:04:53 · answer #7 · answered by Ruth 7 · 1 0

I don't believe I would sell my dignity for a drink. I'm not that desperate for booze.

My husband would never ask me to (or suggest to me that I) do something like that either, he values me more than booze.

People should stop and think about how cheaply they sell themselves these days.

2007-08-07 10:02:43 · answer #8 · answered by Saphira 3 · 1 0

Taking off your ring for a minute for a free drink... why not? Making out for a drink? definitely not.

2007-08-07 10:02:06 · answer #9 · answered by DrewS 2 · 0 1

My personal opinion is that it's a pretty skeezy thing to do. I don't think that it's something I would ever do.

The making out thing is DEFINITELY crossing the line.

2007-08-07 10:19:54 · answer #10 · answered by Adam S 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers