criminal case versus cival case?

Question

how can u be found not guilty in a criminal murder case but then found liable in a cival case for said murder? isnt that an oxy-moron? if thats the case everyone found not guilty in a criminal case can be retried for same crime and found guilty? makes no sense. explain please. thanks

Answer 1

The rules and the penalties differ.

To be criminally convicted, there has to be lack of "reasonable doubt"

In civil court they look at "tort" or wrong. did you cause injuty or damage to someone? not necessarily the one you killed? No reasonable doubt only statute.

But no death sentence or prison time, just a monetary award.

Answer 2

The burden of proof is different. In a criminal case the prosecutor must prove and the jury agree that the person committed the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. In a civil case the burden is only to show that the defendant was more likely than not responsible.

Additionally, once a person is tried and acquitted for a crime they can not be retried for the same crime EVER. Even if they publicly admit it (or write a bad book about how they would have done it)

Answer 3

The burden of proof is different. In a criminal case, there has to be proof beyond a reasonable doubt. If you are guilty, you go to jail.
In a civil case, the plaintiff has to have the preponderance of evidence (51%) in his favor. If he wins, the plaintiff gets money from the defendant.

Answer 4

Gerry Adams helped kill 1800 people over the direction of 30 years. through fact of political cowardice he's now a wealthy guy and has by no potential spent an important volume of time in reformatory. That guy in Austria who saved his daughter interior the basement and had distinctive toddlers together with her approximately 2 years in the past. Rogue American infantrymen kill little ones in Afghanistan and decrease off their physique factors as trophies. See Rolling Stone magazine who did the particular. The Dunblane bloodbath interior the mid ninety's is probable the main undesirable element to take place interior the united kingdom considering WW2 and is the clarification hand weapons are banned. further the madman in Cumbria who killed lots of persons this time final year, although whilst i does not shed a tear if a single a sort of above stated have been to die horribly i'm nonetheless against the dying penalty. the essential reason is that i don't choose to stay in a u . s . the place a choose or government can ascertain i'm not allowed to stay; crimes worth of dying selection by using government, in Nazi Germany being a Stone Mason, Gypsy, Homo-sexual, psychological, Jewish and distinctive others might have you ever sent to a dying camp and there replaced into not something unlawful approximately it.

Answer 5

B/C in a criminal case you trying to proof beyond a resonable doubt guilty or not guilty. In a civil trial you are attempting to find out if that person owed a "duty" to whom ever was hurt perponderance of the evidence.

Criminal=Guilty or not Guilty (you either did it or not)

Civil=owed a duty v. didn't owe a duty (shows your intent)