or communist, or sometimes call her "Hitlery" but cannot point to a single reason to back up their claims other than her favoring some form of universal health care which EVERY Western nation in the world has except the United States?
2007-08-07
09:15:31
·
23 answers
·
asked by
Mitchell .
5
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
Greendguy - I've already read them both. I have a degree in Economics and Marxism was a required course, along with Micro, Macro, and Money and Banking.
And as for taxing oil companies, I'm all for it. The oil industry is not a free market enterprise and they have been given card blanche to write their own policies, which is why we are no closer to energy independence then we were 30 years ago.
2007-08-07
09:27:06 ·
update #1
It has been a consistent and effective strategy to slander an opponent with a derogitory abstract label to render them impotent. If only 10% of the voters are influenced by this tactic, that is enough to turn an election. Using this shameful approach shows how much contempt they have for the voting public, choosing to use slander rather than honest political discourse. Universal Health Care threatens the enormous profits being made off the American public by the Health Care "Industry," so Hillary has been attacked from the beginning for her efforts to tackle this question. Follow the money is always good advice, and in the case of Health Care, there is a lot of money at stake.
2007-08-07 09:23:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by michaelsan 6
·
4⤊
7⤋
absolutely everyone who calls Hillary Clinton a "socialist" or "communist" is the two thoroughly unaware of the which potential of those words, or a liar, or the two. In different words, a Republican. I each and every now and then ask your self approximately rightwingers who're so a techniques off the deep end that actual everyone, that's composed of moderates and different rightwingers look "socialist" by using assessment.
2016-10-09 10:33:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
1. She supports government control over health care.
2. She supports increasing taxes
3. She supports greater government control in our lives.
Here are 3.
As for your comment about western nations having government health care, they have no growth, high unemployment, and Canada and England people die waiting for basic care that they would get here.
2007-08-07 09:36:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by Chainsaw 6
·
4⤊
0⤋
Why don't we let Hill answer that in her own words:
"We are going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."
"We just can't let the American people make those types of choices...Government has to make those choices for people"
"I'm a fan of the social policies you find in Europe."
and my all time favorite, not that it lends support to her being socialist.
"Why do I keep having to prove to people that I'm not a liar?!"
whachumean we can't point to a single reason to back up our claims. Her own statements show her to be a socialist.
Every western nation in the world (a bit redundant don't you think) that has universal healthcare also has a a socialist government, so you refute your own point. Why do you want to be like everyone else?
Its "carte blanche" Mr Degree in Marxism.
2007-08-07 09:24:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
3⤋
Hillary endorses an education program conceived by Marc Tucker,it's called the Human Resources Development Plan for the United States... What is it.... Tucker described it: "What is essential is that we create a seamless web of opportunities to develop one's skills that literally extends from cradle to grave and is the same system for everyone -- young and old, poor and rich, worker and full-time student." He then went on for the rest of the 18 pages to outline in detail what has since become the new School-to-Work curriculum, in which the government plans your life for you, the way it was done in the old Soviet bloc nations in Eastern Europe.
http://www.learn-usa.com/education_transformation/~human_resources.htm
Interested in her health care plan ...
www.heritage.org/Research/HealthCare/tp00.cfm
MANCHESTER, N.H. (AP) - Presidential hopeful Hillary Rodham Clinton outlined a broad economic vision Tuesday, saying it’s time to replace an “on your own” society with one based on shared responsibility and prosperity.
“I prefer a ‘we’re all in it together’ society,” she said. “I believe our government can once again work for all Americans. It can promote the great American tradition of opportunity for all and special privileges for none.”
Special privleges????? I work two jobs ..Hillary is telling us that we should abandon individuality, abandon self-reliance, and become more dependent on the government. She’s calling this “shared prosperity,” which means that she’s going to take some of your prosperity and force you to share it with your neighbor, who maybe isn’t even working to create his/her own prosperity. Which she has already stated in her "I'm going to take those profits" speech..
http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/hillary_clintons_socialist_platform
"The main plank in the National Socialist program is to abolish the liberalistic concept of the individual and the Marxist concept of humanity and to substitute for them the folk community, rooted in the soil and bound together by the bond of its common blood." Adolph Hitler
"Comrades! We must abolish the cult of the individual decisively, once and for all." Nikita Khrushchev , February 25, 1956 20th Congress of the Communist Party
"We must stop thinking of the individual and start thinking about what is best for society." Hillary Clinton, 1993
2007-08-07 09:55:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by bereal1 6
·
4⤊
1⤋
Because they don't know what socialism is. By the measures they use, the U.S. converted to socialism long ago.
The U.S. postal service, public schooling, police and fire services, creation and maintenance of infrastructure, public city buses, public libraries, etc... are all socialist manifestations. But these geniuses don't mention those, and why not? Because they've grown up with them, they're comfortable with them. They don't want to acknowledge that they ALREADY live in a country that relies on services that are common to any social democracy or to any socialist society. And not only do they exist in America... they thrive in America, and those who are the most vocal about the evils of socialism...RELY on them every day of their myopic lives.
2007-08-07 09:42:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
why are the libs so hung up on catch phrases and words. i doubt you know what a neocon is, you just use it because you think it's derogatory. and the socialist program of universal healthcare is an abject failure in every western nation EXCEPT here.
2007-08-07 09:28:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by andy c 4
·
4⤊
2⤋
Let me help you out:
Universal Healthcare is a socialist policy
Hillary supports Universal Healthcare
therefore
Hillary supports socialist policy
If every western nation was jumping off a bridge, would you?
2007-08-07 09:29:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by Pfo 7
·
6⤊
3⤋
One of the first things that Stalin and Mao did was disarm the people. Hillary doesn't support the Second Amendment whatsoever, unless she's in front of the camera. Her words and actions don't jive.
Universal Health care, 'hate crimes' legislation, the list is endless.
2007-08-07 09:29:41
·
answer #9
·
answered by Barney Fife 2
·
5⤊
3⤋
Her mentor was a bona fide communist. Also her dicision to provide universal healthcare is a socialist policy along with her decisions to tax the rich and give more of it to the poor. This is called redistribution of wealth which is one of the main points of socialism. If you want a good read to really compare our current leadership to communists or socialists, then read The Communist Manifesto or Das Kapital by the father of coommunism himself Karl Marx
2007-08-07 09:23:29
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
4⤋