English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-08-07 07:29:55 · 6 answers · asked by amazed we've survived this l 4 in Politics & Government Politics

don't answer unless you are a liberal/progressive

2007-08-07 07:35:44 · update #1

what would US society and foreign policy look like?

2007-08-07 08:00:56 · update #2

6 answers

Domestic Agenda -

Goal Number One: 50% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions in 5 years, 75% in 10 years, pre-1950 levels in 15 years. How we do it:
1) A tax on motor fuel and imported oil would be spent on surface rail, bus and other mass transportation projects to reduce our dependency on the individual automobile.
2) Tax credits would be given for energy conservation to help offset the cost of insulating buildings and homes.
3) Consumption tax on houses over 3000 square feet
4) Consumption tax on gasoline powered cars with engine over 1 liter
5) No tax on diesel fuel
6) Rebuild cities so people can live closer to work

Goal Number Two: Universal health insurance. How we do it: Copy the Canadian system.

Goal Number Three: Immigration reform. What we do: Basically let anybody immigrate who has identification. Photo and fingerprint incoming people at the boarder then issue them a SSN so they can pay taxes.

Foreign Agenda -

Goal Number One: Withdraw from Iraq and dismantle military bases and embassy.

Goal Number Two: Settle the Israeli /Palestinian conflict. Current pro-Islreali stance must be jetisoned in favor of a ballanced approach that recongnizes that the Arabs living in what is now Isreal suffered a wrong when Isreal was created. Some form of compensation must be offered to right this historic wrong. Isreal should withdraw to its pre-1967 borders. Surrounding Arab nations must recongnize Isreal.

Goal Number Three: Get our military out of other countries. Close our forign military bases. Reduce our military expenditures. If we reduce our need for imported oil, we won't need the bases.

Goal Number Four: Reduction in nuclear arsenal. Negotiate with other nuclear powers to reduce nuclear weapons.

Sorry for any typos. Spell check was too slow....

2007-08-07 08:25:18 · answer #1 · answered by spay&neuter-all-republicans 3 · 0 0

Libs are a little loose and lack structure.

Libs seem a little more open and accepting but sometimes a bit much for practical purposes.

2007-08-07 07:45:53 · answer #2 · answered by Triumph 4 · 0 0

Like the land of hope and opportunity it always was historically, instead of the land of fear and suspicion that it's become under the current president.

2007-08-07 11:07:26 · answer #3 · answered by ? 6 · 1 0

What do you mean by potential of "conservative"? Do you mean Republican? using fact Republicans are not conservative. Many are neoconservative, some are liberal, and many comprise libertarian. There are few conservatives in Congress right now. What I define as conservative is somebody who's a average liberal. yet extremely than enable the government to run amok over our inner maximum lives, or disband the government altogether, we seek for a happy medium. extremely than enable the federal government to alter public speech and morality, we circulate away it as much as our very own faith, church, or community to set those standards. extremely than enable the government to grow to be a police state, we prefer to look after ourselves by potential of potential of the 2d modification. extremely than having completely unrestricted abortion (which contains partial beginning abortion, maximum persons oppose this) or no privateness in any understand, we seek for to have a undeniable shrink on once you may and can't have an abortion, yet maximum do no longer seek for to get rid of abortion on occasion. i think of it extremely is a suitable midsection floor. extremely than grow to be completely isolationist, or proceed with American imperialism, we seek for to grow to be greater self-reliant, and easily intervene in international affairs while there is something extreme that threatens national secure practices, or while there are cases of genocide. We seek for to have greater protectionist, professional-growth economic coverage. We seek for to stability the funds and shrink the dimensions of government. i think we would desire to repair the scientific device in this u . s . and reform welfare. there is not any reason human beings might desire to circulate without important scientific care or foodstuff, yet we additionally shouldn't grow to be a rustic that robs peter to pay paul. government scientific and foodstuff credit, extremely than welfare tests, and hire-controlled housing seems to be the answer. There should be a suitable midsection floor for all subjects. despite the fact that, lots of the solutions right here paint conservatives as extremist, while actually genuine conservatism is the definition of moderation, and liberalism isn't an opposing fee of conservative usa. Liberal and conservative are the comparable element. The extremists are libertarian or fascist. in any different case conventional as maximum Republicans and Democrats. Please do no longer mistake our corrupt government as representative of any specific fee device, despite if one occasion is in value. the government is only in it on your money, no longer for political progression.

2016-10-14 07:49:48 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

no better than it did when the republicans had complete control.. we were set up to run on checks and balances for a reason.

2007-08-07 07:41:04 · answer #5 · answered by pip 7 · 3 0

it would look better than it was these past 7 years.

2007-08-07 07:45:22 · answer #6 · answered by Agent 99 3 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers