WOOOOHOOOO Keep talking, Rage! As you can tell, most folks on here have been poisoned against socialism for the past 100 years or so....to the point that they don't even know what they are talking about. I agree with everything you said, and to the person who posted about Medicare, do you actually KNOW anyone on Medicare? They DON'T get all the medicine that they need, and they DO have to choose whether to buy medicine or food at the end of the month.
Good question!
2007-08-07 07:08:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
All I can do to this questions is star it, cause I agree.
I am the same way, and if wanting to help everyone, and every country that needs it, than I guess I am a socialist, and I guess I'm proud of it. If wanting love and peace through giving, helping those in need, sending medicine, stopping genocides, and wiping out starvation makes me a socialist, than so be it, because people need to stop the greed and selfishness. But tell me, who would really admit to Not wanting love and peace, even cons wouldnt go that far.
so if because I think the government should help those who need and care for people who just CANT care for themselves ( like people to old to work) and make things accessable for people who have things like paralysis, then guess I am a socialist all the way. And to all those who think that socialism is horrible and always goes wrong, well think about what being a socialist really means these days, cause to me, a lot of the time it just sounds like humanity to me....not the insulting title cons deem it to be. ...just my thoughts...
2007-08-07 08:36:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by shouting is better 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
I don't think caring for other makes you a socialist. I think it is a pretty regular thing for people to feel empathy. Somehow, anti-communism managed to get so far into people's minds that they think that to care about others is to be a socialist.
I consider myself inclined to socialism in very many respects. When I go back to my country I will join the socialist party there, I believe that meaningful change can be achieved through socialism. Not because it is the only system for people who care about others, but because I believe its particular strategy to have some merits.
I hear a lot of talk about socialism being about government control. Truth is, socialism is about Democratic Control of economic institutions. It is a strategy whose main purpose is to eradicate the difference between the producing class and the capitalist class, that's all. Socialists believe that those who work are entitled to a say. In pure capitalism, you are entitled to a say only if you have money.
I believe that a hybrid system is possible. SO long as it is achieved through popular agreement, I could care less what the actual policies are. I think the working man is capable of making choices for himself.
As for empathy and compassion... I think there are very many people who feel the way we do. It's just the current propaganda war against socialism makes people think that helping others is a bad thing. Or that having certain basic services provided to all without a fee is somehow a sin... if fire fighters and cops are paid by the government (or community) why can't professors and doctors also be paid by the government?
It is not about the size of the government... it's about who is in control, your community or your boss.
2007-08-07 09:22:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
I wouldn't necessarily say based upon these beliefs, that you're a socialist. A socialist believes in the following
the government should actively participate in the daily lives of individuals. That would include economic regulation, universality of social programs - healthcare and education, generous welfare and social insurance (unemployment, disability) programs. Strong support for labor unions, a high minimum wage, affirmative action programs, same sex marriage, right for women to choose to have an abortion. A passive foreign policy including withdrawing or reducing financial support to Israel.
2007-08-07 07:38:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by Kevin D (RIP Adam Yauch MCA) 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
It's a socialist idea when you believe the government should lend the helping hand. The government has taken the role that the church used to have by being the one to help widows, orphans, the poor and disabled. Socialism has nothing to do with caring for people...it has everything to do with making people dependent on government programs. That is not honorable. The government robs this nation of being a people who can truly help one another. Since they take most of our money there is little money left for us to help those in need.
2007-08-07 07:23:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by Kicking 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
A socialist mindset and a socialist government are two different things. A socialist mindset makes us want to lend a helping hand to our neighbors, volunteer at a shelter, read to children, donate blood...whatever you do, you do it to make this country and its people florish by using your physical energy to do it. A socialist government is when you rely on your government to create programs for its country and its people by using yours money in order to help others, invertingly making the society dependents of that government. Society can not thrive if people can not be independent of themselves. Thats why people critizes socialism, but it has an awesome power as an individual mindset.
2007-08-07 07:23:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by ChickenTrainTakeTheChickensAway 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Democratic Socialist are extremely progressives making use of a distinctive call. we are being divided and everyone in spite of occasion are going to pay the value. There are to lots of people who do no longer believe that, do exactly no longer care and then there are persons that desire it to take place. Progressives are the main appropriate difficulty. The democrats think of they are in value despite the fact that the progressives are extremely in value and the dems do no longer seem to appreciate that. the genuine democrats have no thought they misplaced their occasion and are not doing something to renounce it so as that they are able to regain their political occasion. they are taking the function of spectators & cheerleaders at a conflict that is composed of the death of their destiny as properly as our countries destiny. The progressives are actually attempting to declare the democratic occasion as theirs. Republicans & Democrats use to artwork issues out for the earnings of our human beings & u . s .. using fact the progressives entered on the scene they have been working at dividing us to take us over. I see all of us working around thinking cutting-edge potential progression. Why do a good number of persons think of progression is linked with Progressivism? Is it using fact the observe progression is in cutting-edge? If this is their foundation. Is Marxism progression? The progressives are their very own occasion and hijacked the democratic occasion making use of the liberal label. The cutting-edge occasion in no way ought to get everyone elected. for this reason they hijacked and are working the democratic occasion. Progressivism isn't only an thought however the practice that the government is conscious superb and has finished administration and possession over each thing such as folk. Progressivism does no longer believe in government because it extremely is now. With that I mean progressivism does no longer believe that representation of the persons is needed using fact the administrative branch runs each thing and is conscious what's great. human beings are the valuables of the government like animals are owned by potential of persons. there is not any such element as peoples rights including freedom, privateness, individualism and so on. in case you have ever seen the Borg on celeb Trek that is comparable. Progressivism operates under the facade of appearing to be a central authority doing what's great for the persons without their enter and silencing all opposition.
2016-10-14 07:42:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by Erika 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't know if you are a socialist or not, but socialist is not a bad word in any way, shape or form. You sound to me like someone who would enjoy, and get a lot out of Neale Donald Walsch's books! These books are not JUST spiritual. They contain a detailed description of what a highly evolved and enlightened civilization would be like. *sm*
2007-08-07 08:36:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by LadyZania 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
The label "socialist" is misused a lot on these answers either from ignorance or to bait others.
All of what you are describing exists in other democratic nations (Canada, UK, Ireland, etc.) without losing the capitalist free market. There is wealth, a middle class, and some poverty in all these nations... they also enjoy the same luxuries as we do.
There is nothing wrong with what you believe in... your opinions are actually implemented in the majority of the Democratic world and those nations are far from being socialist.
2007-08-07 06:53:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by cattledog 7
·
4⤊
1⤋
A socialist believes that the government should run our lives and that we have little responsibility for our own actions. In some respects you show signs of being a socialist and in other respects that of being an isolationist or libertarian. That is the neat thing about these titles - people don't fit into them all the way. I am a hard line conservative, but don't believe in the death penalty (a very liberal view). Just as an example. Capitalist, which I view myself as, believe that people are best served with little government interference and so they'll have more during their lives - and won't have to choose between food and medication when older.
2007-08-07 06:48:51
·
answer #10
·
answered by netjr 6
·
3⤊
5⤋