This man combines sound intellectual wisdom with charisma and academic proficiency.
Again,i have observed that every word/s that comes out of his mouth carries potential with it.1.potential to influence.2.potential to dismantle.3.potential to be theorized.4.potential to educate.5.potential to unite.6.potential for change.
To be truthful,this man has become like a learning/academic institution - now,people pass through him.Lastly,on close observance,i have noticed that his fellow contestants seem to learn from what he has to say.No doubt that what we could learn from him,we might never learn or have learnt from the four walls of an institution.What options do other contestants have other than giving in to his principles ? Check this out & many more in youtube ....
http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/politics/2007/08/06/tsr.strategy.session.monday.cnn
http://youtube.com/watch?v=BIKhplu0IJk&mode=user&search=
http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/08/03/obama.pakistan.ap
2007-08-07 05:11:05 · 4 answers · asked by chikantima 1 in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
He is nothing but a liar that wants your vote. Clinton will beast him without even trying to.
2007-08-07 05:21:49 · answer #1 · answered by Williamstown 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do not give experience as an excuse to discredit him.Those that have been there for years,what good have they brought about?.Let us give chance to him that has opened the door for change by involving the average man,the poor & the elite on ways of overhauling USA.Meanwhile can you draw a line b/n education & experience or does one give birth to the other.
2007-08-07 06:03:03 · answer #2 · answered by Mark Q 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He's smart but he lacks experience. I prefer Edwards.
2007-08-07 05:41:48 · answer #3 · answered by notyou311 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
im confused
2007-08-07 05:18:41 · answer #4 · answered by Jackie 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋