When did the world develop this giant conspiracy to discredit George W. Bush?

Question

According to most of the conservatives on here, George Bush has been a wonderful president, but has been the victim of a worldwide conspiracy to undermine his presidency. So just so I have this right:

pro-Bush..truth
anti-Bush...lies and part of the worldwide conspiracy

Answer 1

Never. The conspiracy is a fiction of your mind.

Answer 2

I'm an Obama supporter and these are my thoughts: I like Ron Paul even though I don't necessarily agree with Libertarianism and the first one to try it will probably see extreme aftereffects and the idea will go down in flames. I am thirty years old and this will be the first election I vote in. I have always felt that there is a two party illusion in this country and the rich put who they want in office. It actually scares me that Obama got as far as he has and yet, he seems so genuine. How did he break through the duality? Ron Paul would have been a much better opponent for Obama and might have made him sweat a little. I don't understand how McCain is so high in the polls when Bush was so low. I guess people in general are stupid and it's the same people who voted for Bush two times! Republicans know if they vote for Ron Paul it will be a wasted vote, which is why Independents don't get many votes. They're afraid if they grow some balls and vote for him, that the worser of the assumed two evils will get the white house. Until we can convince more people to vote Independent and stay away from the parties, this duality will continue.

Answer 3

The GOP and the far-Right have a idiotic view of the truth. In their eyes the truth is what they say it is.

Bunch of power-hungry narcissists if you ask me.

Funny how their heroes are really weak men put in the office of the Presidency so they could be controlled by others.

Some of the people that controlled the first also controlled the second. (Look up the players in the Reagan Presidency!)

Both regimes left our country in horrible shape. A huge deficit. A larger gap between the rich and the middle-class and a loss of our rights.

The Democrats are not perfect but I will take them any day of the week over the GOP!

We need to make sure the puppeteers do not find another puppet to control!

Answer 4

Wrong question. Better to ask, "When did the World develop this Giant Conspiracy to notice that George W. Bush was discrediting himself?"

For me, it happened back when he was Governor of Texas and sped up executions BECAUSE DNA evidence was taking prisoners off Death Row. And Texas executed more prisoners than all of the Sharia states combined. Not very effective. Crime in Texas did drop under the Clinton Crime Bill with it's massive influx of funding for local cops--but at about a fifth the rate that crime dropped in other States.

He also inspired Illinois Republicans to introduce "Rolando's Law" which sought to limit appeals so that an embarrassment like the clearing of Rolando Cruz and the charges that were brought against prosecutors for falsifying evidence and suppressing exculpatory evidence after he had spent 12 years on Death Row for the murder of Jeanine Nicarico could never happen again.

Answer 5

Are we looking for a vast left wing conspiracy now? There's no need. Bush did a great job of discrediting himself. If you don't believe me consider this:

Look at how many Republican candidates will evoke the name of Reagan or remind the voters of their Christian values but will avoid any mention of the current two term President. There's a reason for that and it's because he's stunk up the office like a rancid bean burrito fart.

Answer 6

The world developed it when Bush began instituting his policies, which are a giant conspiracy to make money for neoconservatives at the expense of anyone and anything that gets in their way.

Answer 7

World wide Conspiracy? Sounds a lot like Vast Right Wing Conspiracy does it. ROFLMFAO!!!!

The Dems came up with the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy to discredit valid complaints about "Slick Willie" Now Reps (and I am one sorry to say) have come up with World Wide Conspiracy to discredit equally valid complaints about Georgie Boy!

When I see a Bushie talk about Conspiracy I bust my gut laughing for it was not long ago the same bunch was defending against Conspiracy charges. There is no more a Worldwide Conspiracy to undermine Bush than there was a Vast Right Wing Conspiracy to undermine Clinton.

ROFLMFAO!!!!!!

Answer 8

To those lame, tired, insipid, lackluster, unimaginative parrots who keep saying over and over and over that the media is "liberal" -- THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS "THE LIBERAL MEDIA." Yes, there are liberals who work in the media. So? Do YOU get to override YOUR boss at YOUR work? No, you don't.
*********************************
Rupert Murdoch: “Famous for : Building one of the largest media empires in the world with interests in television, film, pay TV, the Internet, newspapers, and publishing.

Rupert Murdoch, head of the world's largest media empire, has used his influential position to push an ideological agenda closely associated with U.S. neoconservatives. During the lead up to the U.S. invasion of and war in Iraq, the editors of Murdoch's 175 media holdings vociferously supported President George W. Bush and Prime Minister Tony Blair's pro-war campaign. One British newspaper opined: "You have got to admit that Rupert Murdoch is one canny press tycoon because he has an unerring ability to choose editors across the world who think just like him. How else can we explain the extraordinary unity of thought in his newspaper empire about the need to make war on Iraq?

After an exhaustive survey of the highest-selling and most influential papers across the world owned by Murdoch's News Corporation, it is clear that all are singing from the same hymn sheet. Some are bellicose baritone soloists who relish the fight. Some prefer a less strident, if more subtle, role in the chorus. But none, whether fortissimo or pianissimo, has dared to croon the anti-war tune. Their master's voice has never been questioned"

http://rightweb.irc-online.org/profile/1304

Answer 9

It's just a difference of opinion. A conspiracy would mean someone is hiding something and trying to tell you something else.

Like George Bush went AWOL. Or he was behind 9/11. Or he lied to get us into the Iraq War.

Oh wait, there is a conspiracy to discredit him. Never mind.

Answer 10

you perception is wrong. it is not a conspiracy but an attack on what they do not like, whether it is right or wrong. bush has done a good job and has not waivered from doing the right thing whether people like him or not. the south koreans are blaming bush for their people being taken by the taliban. how is that his fault. the dems are blaming his admin for the bridge collapse in minn. this is the kind of thing good leaders have to deal with when people can't or won't take responsability for their actions.at worst he is better than any dem to hold office in the past thirty years. do not be a hater.

Answer 11

No...no...no
The problem is blaming Bush for the most absurd things that go wrong, such as the bridge collapse, New Orleans (Katrina), 9-11, and terrorism.

If they want to argue about the Iraq war, then fine.
If they want to argue about the patriot act, then fine.
If they want to argue about his real reason for invading Iraq, then fine.
But drop the conspiracy theory stories and stick to facts and sane ideas.
Terrorism has been around way before he came to office.
States and local governments have responsibilities to their jurisdictions, so levees, bridges, are the responsibility of their respective state/local agency.