I was offered Laveranues Coles, Darrell Jackson, DJ Hackett and Duece McAllister for Larry Fitzgerald and Rudi Johnson
2007-08-07 04:17:29 · 9 answers · asked by Wes 5 in Sports ➔ Fantasy Sports
Unless you have absolutely no WR depth right now, there is no reason to give up a # 1 RB and # 1 WR to get a handful of backup WRs and a # 2 RB.
Rudi is a proven fantasy star, and Fitz is one of the best WRs available. On the other hand, Deuce not only shares the ball with Bush, but the Saints want to give Reggie more rushes in addition to the pass plays he got last year. Coles is a decent # 2 fantasy option, but Jackson is more of a # 3. Hackett has the potential to have a solid season if he secures the Seahawks second starting spot opposite Branch, but even he will be a # 2 WR at best.
Only take this trade if you think it will improve your starting lineup, which will be very difficult when you are losing two of the top players at their positions.
2007-08-07 04:23:29 · answer #1 · answered by T F 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I would take it. Rudi's role in Cincy is going to be limited this year. More then likely Kenny Irons will start sometime after the first couple of games. Duece is overshadowed by Reggie Bush and doesnt get the yards he use to but he still gets the TD's. Darrell Jackson should have a breakout year with the 49ers. The Cardinals are switching to a run more/zone blocking scheme much like the Broncos so although Larry F. is going to be good this year I think Darrell Jackson is going to be better.
2007-08-07 04:48:29 · answer #2 · answered by SHANE M 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dont know.. Thats a tough one..
Coles is a #1 WR for the Jets and Fitrgerald is the #2 for the Cards but, he still gets 90+ catches a year
Rudi is the Bangels #1 RB and gets alot of goaline rushes..
McAllister does too but, you have Bush in the mix in New Orleans
So, it just depends on how bad do you need Jackson and Hackett.. They are both average players at best.. Wavier wire players.. Nothing more..
So, I guess, I would keep what I have.. More WR will be open on the wavier wire that are just as good as what your geting in this trade..
2007-08-07 04:53:02 · answer #3 · answered by Jason 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I'd turn that down.
Jackson is going to run into tons of double coverage because he's the 49ers only real receiving threat, and neither Coles nor Hacket is an elite player. Coles is a good receiver, but he's not in an offense that will be powerful through the air. Deuce is still good, but he'll be sharing that backfield with Reggie Bush.
Even with Boldin back, Fitzgerald is a top-tier receiver. And Rudi will benefit from both Cincy's powerful offense and a lack of competition at the running back position. I'd expect him to put up another 1,000-yard, 10+ TD season.
Turn that one down - he's trying to give you filler in exchange for serious quality.
2007-08-07 04:21:56 · answer #4 · answered by Craig S 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
TURN DOWN THIS OFFER... Keep Fitzgerald and Rudi Johnson. They are giving you 4 players for 2 players for a reason. Duece will give you some FF points but the other receivers will not give you that many points.
This trade doesn't favor you at all.
2007-08-07 05:11:28 · answer #5 · answered by Thomas 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NOT IN A MILLION YEARS!!!! You have the best 2 players in the deal
2007-08-07 06:18:18 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
dude anytime someone offers a bunch of guys for a few guys in return it means something..
it means all those guys are not worth teh few guys..
never make those trades ever
follow that and get a
Championship!!!
2007-08-07 06:07:23 · answer #7 · answered by chuckey is ill 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no way you'll have to drop players to and you're trading a top 10 RB and WR for pretty much, nobodies.
2007-08-07 04:31:31 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i have no idea what your talking about
2007-08-08 03:04:41 · answer #9 · answered by Iylla Rae 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋