Edit2: e^(xt)
[I was missing the x :( ]
2007-08-07 02:33:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
1
2007-08-07 02:35:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
1 + (x/n)^nt
= 1 + [xn^(-1)]^nt
= 1 + x^[n^(+1)n^(-1)t]
the n's will cancel out
= 1 + x^t
so that the limit with no n's in the equation.
2007-08-07 02:45:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
First we do the parenthesis and get 1.
1 to an infinite power is still 1.
ANSWER = 1.
2007-08-07 03:11:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
e^h -one million for extremely small values of h is approximately = h So e^h is approximately = h +one million So e is approximately = (h+one million)^(one million/h) So lim (one million+h)^(one million/h) =e h-> 0 Or, set t=one million/h, then lim (one million+one million/t)^t =e t-> infinity For extra formal proofs see advantageous, Calculus, website seventy one or Smail, factors of the thought of countless strategies, pages 38-40-one.
2016-12-30 04:44:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
e^t
lim ((1+(x/n))^n)^t = lim ((n+x)/n)^t = e^t
n->inf __________n->inf
x becomes negligible becuase lim (an+x)/bn= a/b
_______________________n->inf
2007-08-07 02:43:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by Mitchell 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
e^(xt)
2007-08-07 02:41:41
·
answer #7
·
answered by iyiogrenci 6
·
0⤊
0⤋