Do you think if we passed a law to use the death penalty more frequently it would decrease the amount of crime

Answer 1

No. The deterrent effect is questionable at best. In the U.S., violent crime rates are actually higher in death penalty states. This may seem counterintuitive, and there are many theories about why this is (Ted Bundy saw it as a challenge, so he chose Florida – the most active execution state at the time – to carry out his final murder spree). Personally, I think it has to do with the hypocrisy of taking a stand against murder…by killing people. The government becomes the bad parent who says, ‘do as I say, not as I do.’

There are also many other practical reasons to abolish capital punishment:

1. By far the most compelling is this: Sometimes the legal system gets it wrong. Look at all the people who have been released after years of imprisonment because they were exonerated by DNA evidence. Unfortunately, DNA evidence is not available in most cases. No matter how rare it is, the government should not risk executing one single innocent person.

2. Because of the extra expense of prosecuting a DP case and the appeals process (which is necessary - see reason #1), it costs taxpayers MUCH more to execute prisoners than to imprison them for life.

3. There’s also an argument to be made that death is too good for the worst of our criminals. Let them wake up and go to bed every day of their lives in a prison cell, and think about the freedom they DON’T have, until they rot of old age. When Ted Bundy was finally arrested in 1978, he told the police officer, “I wish you had killed me.”

4. The government ought to be secular, but for those who invoke Christian law in this debate, you can find arguments both for AND against the death penalty in the Bible. For example, Matthew 5:38-39 insists that violence shall not beget violence. James 4:12 says that God is the only one who can take a life in the name of justice. Leviticus 19:18 warns against vengeance (which, really, is what the death penalty amounts to). In John 8:7, Jesus himself says, "let he who is without sin cast the first stone."

Answer 2

No.

No reputable study shows the death penalty to be a deterrent. To be a deterrent a punishment must be sure and swift. The death penalty is neither. Homicide rates are higher in states and regions that have it than in states that do not.

48 states have life without parole on the books. It means what it says, costs much less than capital punishment (with its extremely complicated and prolonged legal process) and it is both swift and sure.

Answer 3

You mean act as a deterrent? It doesn't work as a deterrent now, does it? If it did, Death Row would be empty, wouldn't it?

Having spent a fair amount of time studying the criminal mind (my major is Psychology) I can tell you that people who want to commit criminal actions don't think like the rest of the population. An over-riding difference is that they don't think of consequences; practically all of them think they won't get caught.

The DP is very expensive; it's actually cheaper to sentence someone to life without possibility of parole.

Answer 4

Becuase like numerous, religions, even Islam has it is extremists. Muslims could obey the guidelines of the host u . s . despite in the event that they contradict Islamic regulation. In this way of case, Muslims are asked by using Islam emigrate from and bypass away that u . s .. Islam does not enable rebellian against the government. in simple terms in the process the court docket device and criminal recourse is a Muslim allowed to respond. Muhammad (sa) replaced into persecuted, his people killed and robbed, and he did not respond for 13 years, nor did he combat back. yet, they remained in staying power. ultimately, while it became clean that their rights as Muslims have been going to proceed to be destroyed, they migrated and left. in simple terms while the Meccans save on with them did the Muslims combat back. In Islam, there's a clean coaching that there is no compulsion in faith (2:257). although, Pakistan has enforced it is rules and spiritual minorities can not prepare their non violent techniques of worship. a number of those minorities are Ahmadi Muslims. although, those Ahmadi Muslims at the instant are not battling back with violence, yet with staying power and prayer, and via the criminal device allowed by using the government. I trust the asker that shariah regulation should not be imposed on absolutely everyone who does not like it imposed on them. The case with the British regulation incorporating shariah regulation, although, isn't something new. British regulation has already integrated some Talmud and Torah regulation. the clarification is, Jews had to have arbritration by using the valid government, so those rules prepare just to Jews. further, if the British gov't formally took in factors of shariah regulation, it would prepare just to those Muslims who needed it to prepare to them. That, i can trust through fact it does not infringe upon the rights of people who do not trust shariah regulation. love for all, hatred for none

Answer 5

No. It has never decreased the crime rate.

Answer 6

I think it would take time to sink in that we mean business but in the long run yes I think it would cut down on crime. If nothing else it will cut down on the population!

Answer 7

thats a good question i think they should bring it back because peole who commit crime now a days dont get punished its a joke so i think bringing it back would stop the crime rate rising and rising especially when they have to let rapists and child affenders out of prison because there is no room!!!!!!!!!

Answer 8

i doubt it. "crime" has been around since the dawn of man. regardless of the consequences some people are just criminals and cant control themselves. they don't make wise choices

Answer 9

I belive it will get some people thinking,If I hurt someone,I might die myself...But there is alot of them out there who don't care one bit....

Answer 10

I agree with that!