what a stupid question!!
I have hundreds of pictures of my son so what does that make me!!!
2007-08-07 02:04:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
3⤋
I dont think its strange at all that the parents of Maddie have alot of photos... I took roll after roll every day, of my first child and I will admit it slowed down with the other two. Just because we dont see the photos of the other children doesnt mean there arent just as many! Why would they want to show the world the other two and exploit them, when its Maddie the world is looking for?! Somebody watched that sweet little girl for god knows how long...If I was her parents,I know I couldnt bear the thought, that maybe my other children were being looked at because I let some weirdo! They have kept the press alive,to keep Maddie's face fresh in people's minds.If they stop doing this,the risk of losing Maddie forever will more than likely become a certainty! While her profile is still so high whoever has her will possibly be laying low and not moving much,meaning there is more of a chance of her still being close. She is obviously missing already but could disappear forever in a more secluded country..... EVERYONE WHO HONESTLY CARES....PLEASE ASK THE MCANNS TO LOOK AT BRIANSDREAMS.COM (under last nights dreams section) THE MORE PEOPLE WHO ASK THEM TO LOOK, MIGHT JUST GET IT THROUGH TO THEM!! Have a look yourselves!! I cried when I read what he said!!! I honestly think he has the knowledge of little Maddies whereabouts. He asks for no money just that they PLEASE contact him....DO IT FOR MADELEINE!! MAY ANGELS PROTECT HER AND MAY HER PARENTS LOVE HER ENOUGH TO PUT THEIR BELIEFS ASIDE LONG ENOUGH TO FIND HER God forgives all..Surely he would forgive them for trying everything to get her back!! Simone, mother of three under 6....
2007-08-10 03:33:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by Simone P 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have thought long and hard about this case, if someone was watching the parents or guardians checking on madeleine every so often, and saw that they were entering through the doors, as they said were left unlocked as not to disturb the children, why did the "kidnapper/s" force open a shutter in order to snatch the child, surely given the time frame , it would have been easier to gain access the same way as the parents had been doing?, plus the fact the abductors would have been taking an awful big risk on the parents not coming back unexpectedly.
Furher to this is you wanted to snatch a child, you could have done that elsewhere, a beach , a street, why take such a big risk?.
2007-08-09 00:51:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by thebikesblue 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I must be really weird, at last count I had about 5500 pics of my two grandchildren, ages 1 1/2 and 3.
I have only one or two pics of myself when young and wish I had a lot more. That is one reason.
Digital pics are virtually free to take as many as you want. That is another reason.
Using collage maker software I have hard copied about 4000 images for a gift to my son and wife. Actual cost was about 40$. That is a third reason and enough for me.
Some people love children and some seem indifferent to them....I know which group I'm in.
The whole world's strange. get used to it, it wasn't set up just for you or me, it's a broader spectrum thing which tries to offer something for a wide variety of beliefs and feelings, life styles etc.
2007-08-07 02:23:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by andyg77 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
it extremely is approximately time that a British newspaper jumped out of line and started to question the McCanns behaviour.We on YA (properly some human beings ) have been soliciting for solutions for weeks. enable's wish that the journalists have been delving at the back of the curtain and could very quickly open up the flood gates and flush out this pair of crooks. they are able to't be allowed to commute the international gathering a fortune and pulling the wool over the eyes of all of us they meet. those are the negligent human beings and that they brought about Maddy's "disappearance". Why might desire to we sense sorry for them. I only sense sorry for his or her babies having such irresponsible dad and mom.
2016-10-14 06:56:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Oh my god, that is so strange. I never noticed it before. Why would they want to take photos of their baby girl? Why would they want the press to keep her profile high? And although her death has not been confirmed, I really think there is a link between it and all the photos.
Seriously though, messed up! I don't even own a photo album containing the pics of my loved ones. Only murderers have them, in my humble opinion.
2007-08-07 02:24:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
I have one child who is only 2 years old and I have something like 1000 photos of her. No, not strange at all.
2007-08-07 09:23:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I have literally thousands of pictures of my little girl. With a digital camera why not take a billion pictures of the most fascinating creature on the planet - my baby?
We don't know whether Madeleine is alive or dead, but any family that could would make press out of a missing child - wouldn't you?
2007-08-07 02:12:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by Skidoo 7
·
4⤊
2⤋
what the hell is wrong with you, maybe you just come from a cold family that dont like to take family pics. i cant believe you'd ask such a stupid question. ive got at least 5 albums worth of photos of myself at that age.
they're actually doing all these press conferences to get the media attention on the case and it's worked because theres photos of madeleine all around the world and it's on the news all over.
and by the way you sick twisted tw@t she hasn't been found dead so show some bloody respect
you should feel utterly ashamed of yourself
2007-08-07 02:21:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by bex98 4
·
0⤊
3⤋
not at all,I have boxes of photographs of all of my kids.Although I do agree with you about there being something strange about the whole setup.From Madeleine,s disappearance, to the botched investigation.The crime scene has been well and truly contaminated as holiday makers are still being allowed to rent the apartment.
2007-08-10 11:24:30
·
answer #10
·
answered by irene s 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I dont think its strange at all, my mum has hundreds of photos of me and my brother from when we were younger and if raising awareness through images of the little girl will aid her getting found then any other parent would do it. I think this case has had heightened media coverage due to the nature of where they were and how it happened. They were in a supposedly safe setting and they were in a family orientated resort, most children that go missing are at home, in their own town and arent in bed sleeping. I think the media coverage shouldnt be questioned, it is the most powerful way of generating awareness and is therefore going to be the best way of communicating with the public.
2007-08-07 02:07:57
·
answer #11
·
answered by peroxide.pixie 5
·
1⤊
3⤋