2007-08-06 18:00:34 · 15 answers · asked by Habitus 4 in Home & Garden ➔ Garden & Landscape
I mean all kinds of moles, the furry diggers, and the human information diggers.
2007-08-06 18:03:19 · update #1
I don't know what kind of statement. Thought you might have some creative interpretations. Maybe the statement that we're tired of so much secrecy.
2007-08-06 18:04:59 · update #2
I would think that sacks of manure would make a more accurate statement.
2007-08-06 18:04:58 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Dumping moles of any type onto the WH lawn will not only get them killed but fail to make a statement of any real effect. Organizations exist solely for the purpose of their extermination, all types.
2007-08-06 18:11:45 · answer #2 · answered by solo_powered_boatie 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Why? The taxpayers are going to pay to have the moles removed, the lawn fixed and whatever else the white house politicians can find for us to pay for. Don't we pay enough as it is without some jerk like you adding more problems.
2007-08-06 18:11:52 · answer #3 · answered by Judy 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
NO! Not only will the tax payers have to pay for the clean-up we will probably have to quadruple the amount because it's a well know fact that the GAO doesn't know how to make a sound purchase for a reasonable fee.
2007-08-06 21:07:48 · answer #4 · answered by LucySD 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
The secrecy connection is somewhat amusing, but don't do it. Not nice for the critters, & the lawn belongs to all of us , regardless of who the occupant is. (& you don't want to end up in Gitmo, or some other secret, nasty place . ;D)
2007-08-06 19:57:43 · answer #5 · answered by mikeinportc 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
i doubt the secret service would allow it...they don't just let people wander on to the lawn at whim, you know. if they did, there would be people making "statements" with their bowels and bladders on that lawn every day.
2007-08-06 19:35:22 · answer #6 · answered by ellarosa 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I think you've been reading too many books.
If you think you can hurt the president this way, think again. Who owns the White House? We do. You and I.
2007-08-06 18:43:03 · answer #7 · answered by felines 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Why do you idiots like to ruin property and think it makes a statement?
2007-08-06 18:08:40 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
You have no statement. You just want attention. You want attention by trying to destroy grass. Go back to your Nintendo.
2007-08-06 18:22:40 · answer #9 · answered by HowlnWoof 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
no, because then thay'd have to pay more taxpayer dollars to get rid of them, and wouldn't actually make a statement anyone will caer about. sorry
2007-08-06 18:08:14 · answer #10 · answered by f0876and1_2 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋