English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

They run from him because they know most Americans do not like or respect the job Bush is doing running the country.

But, how exactly, are they that different then him?

They support the same stay the course strategy on Iraq.

They support his tax cuts and huge increases in defense and security spending, and the resulting deficits that come with it.

And they LARGELY support his limits on abortion, stem cell research, and gay marriage, and his anti-terrorism strategy, government bought by corporate lobbyists, free-trade/outsourcing ideas, etc, etc.

2007-08-06 17:33:30 · 14 answers · asked by trovalta_stinks_2 3 in Politics & Government Politics

14 answers

They're all useless. Maybe Giuliani can show the other candidates how to dress up in drag and Romney can marry 3 or 4 of them. I'm just kidding, maybe.

2007-08-06 17:45:25 · answer #1 · answered by Mitchell . 5 · 1 1

Ron Paul has strongly voted against Bush on the war, increase taxes, the list goes on and on. He not only believes we should bring our troops home, he also thinks we never should of went into Iraq. He is pro life but does not agree with Roe vs Wade by making federal law on an issue that should be voted at a state level.But you probably didn't get a chance to see or really hear him at the republican debate that's because the republican party and paid media try hide him. Support Ron Paul
ronpaul2008.com check him out he is what you have been waiting for.

2007-08-06 17:48:49 · answer #2 · answered by ChickenTrainTakeTheChickensAway 2 · 1 0

i could only choose to handle the cruise missile comments thank you. What the senator from oklahoma became concerning became that invoice clinton being so fearful approximately his crappy presidential legacy became too cowardly to deliver troops into afghanistan so he went approximately dropping our cruise missiles of which we've a constrained quantity, are very costly, and are one in all our terrific nuclear deterrants against russia and china. Clinton became employing a techniques too many cruise missiles all the way by way of out his 2 words as president he became additionally draining the strategic oil reserve to maintain gas fees a pair of pennies decrease that's a inexpensive thank you to boost his recognition in the polls however the those reserves are saved for a reason that reason being to verify we in no way have yet another gas disaster like we did in the 70's. That being pronounced I observed your profile and that i think of that obama feels like a good guy or woman and could make a good president even though it wont be long earlier clinton and edwards stab him in the lower back they probaly will connect forces against him. i think of rudy guliani is a good guy additionally so perhaps he or obama will win the subsequent election and we are able to have a metamorphosis from bush/clintons in the white domicile.

2016-11-11 10:31:00 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Ron Paul has never supported the Iraq engagement, supports tax cuts but doesn't think the U.S. should be the world's policeman, and supports sound money which would eliminate deficits.

2007-08-06 17:42:54 · answer #4 · answered by Bob G 5 · 1 0

1) More articulate
2) Most hate Pres. Bush's immigration plan
3) As far as the top tier candidates, more socially liberal
4) Have a track record of cutting spending (especially Mitt Romney as gov. of Mass.)
5) Don't have a former pres. as their father
6) Have a defining moment that put them their (9/11, 2002 Olympics, endured a POW camp)
7) Believe in smaller gov.

2007-08-06 17:42:27 · answer #5 · answered by Kenneth T 1 · 0 1

they all are the same. too worried about people liking them so they can get elected. they tow the party line. they are politicians. say anything do anything.
example. they spent the entire debate complaining about the democrats and what the democratic canidated said or didn't say. instead of stating their positions and telling people why they should vote instead they tell why you shouldn't vote for the other guy. the only one who useto have some backbone was Mcain. but he's changed to apeal to a more broader set. of republicans.

2007-08-06 18:19:13 · answer #6 · answered by nicholas b 3 · 0 0

Most of them have promised to cut spending which Bush hasn't done. As a matter of fact he has increased spending at record numbers.

2007-08-06 17:36:16 · answer #7 · answered by - 6 · 1 0

Ron Paul doesn't support Dictator Bush.

Ron Paul for President!
It's a Ron Paul rEVOLution!

2007-08-06 17:40:52 · answer #8 · answered by ohm 6 · 2 2

whats the alternative...the antics of another clinton..??? lmfao

- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*
- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
- First president sued for sexual harassment.
- First president accused of rape.
- First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- First president to be held in contempt of court
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court

2007-08-06 23:40:04 · answer #9 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 0 0

Most of them are not braggerts with nothing to back it up and most of them know when to keep their mouths shut.

2007-08-06 17:36:02 · answer #10 · answered by Wrong number 5 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers