Did you know she went to the Daily Kos convention and got booed?
2007-08-06 15:45:17 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
"out of the car long hair"
2007-08-06 15:48:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 3⤋
I don't really think that conservatives understand the difference between the liberal Democrats who prefer Obama and the moderates who prefer Clinton. They don't bother to make distinctions like that, they just throw them all in the same "liberal" basket together and call it a day.
Yep, she got booed, but there's much more to the story than that. She actually got shown some grudging respect at last from some of the DailyKos'ers because she stood up there and didn't back down from her position on anything. Here's a great article that puts the whole thing in perspective. It's some interesting reading:
Clinton gains respect at gathering of bloggers
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/08/05/MNS6RD3Q01.DTL&feed=rss.news
2007-08-06 16:31:14 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
they are assuming no such difficulty. it is good-wing incorrect information at its terrific. why? because of the fact the whole theory that any one is featuring government controlled well-being care is a lie created by the terrific suited to unfold worry and paranoia of standard well-being coverage. a thoroughly differen difficulty than nationalizing well-being care as actual-wingers desire to scare human beings into questioning. Many liberals oppose government nationalizing well-being care, although they help most of the present proposals of univeral well-being coverage. consistent with risk you may attempt determining what is going on till now flapping that yap. yet to be common, the stance of adjusting the well-being care equipment is the liberal stance and people who help Obama's plan are liberals in admire to that one difficulty.
2016-12-11 12:29:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That scares me . . . not because Hillary got booed, but because she got booed for not being far enough to the Left.
It scares me because there are people out there who have seen Socialism, Communism, and Marxism fail everywhere they've ever been implemented (with horrific results, in terms of human suffering) but they still cling to the notion that any of these ideologies would be good for America. It scares me that their votes count as much as mine does.
Guys, if you are ashamed of admitting to being a Socialist, and feel compelled to change your title to "Progressive" or whatever, in the hopes of eliminating the excess baggage in a name, well . . . maybe there is a reason why most people find your idea of government so repulsive.
2007-08-06 15:56:35 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Hillary is a creation of FOX Network. Murdoch has poured millions into Hillary's Campaign. Neandercons need a target for thier hate and Hillary is perfect for the role. Well worth the millions FOX has invested.
Just look at the hysterical posts on this site
2007-08-06 15:56:31 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
She gets booed quite a bit. For a good reason.
2007-08-06 16:02:30 · answer #6 · answered by trf6x6 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Isn't she leading in all your polls lefty? Apparently a lot of you can stand her, or she scares the piss out of you, but rather than fight back you just beg and plead for a discussion.
2007-08-06 16:32:33 · answer #7 · answered by bigdaddy33 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If you're going to ask a question like this you might want to include more facts. She received a smattering of boos because of her response to a single question. It's not like they booed her as soon as she took the stage.
2007-08-06 15:50:53 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Well unless somebody like Ralph Nader runs they will vote for her before they would vote for a republican. I, on the other hand would vote for Ron Paul before I'd vote for Hillary but my choice is Rudy at this point.
2007-08-06 15:53:33 · answer #9 · answered by scarlettt_ohara 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I have a good clue that she is widely hated, by the right. I think NOW would temporarily give up abortion rights to get her in.
2007-08-06 15:59:10 · answer #10 · answered by SteveA8 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
If Clinton gets elected, the only reason will have been ignorant young girls just wanted to see the first woman president. Certain other democratic candidates would be elected for very similar reasons.
2007-08-06 15:53:01 · answer #11 · answered by Cheryl F 1 · 2⤊ 4⤋