Sure would after all the new criteria for what makes a planet. Would include the Earths Moon now days.
2007-08-06 14:58:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by MARLON SEPPALA 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
Such a vote by ignorant people would hardly be meaningful. It's useful in science to have a meaningful and consistent definition for what we consider a planet. Demoting Pluto is simply a matter of intellectual honesty. Why is this such an issue?
2007-08-06 16:26:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by Frank N 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
the cold planet has sequential chemical relation to the other planets, elevation or declivities relative to it's function within the solar flux conjunct descriptively with the internal forces of the solar system .relatively less power do to virgo and interstellar Aquarius, revolutions in Antarres placement, (it used to be in Auarius, and Virgo's inter-cellestial domination, decreasing Andromedas relative inter galactic relevance make a matrixical thought on the strength of interstellar Scorpio, if the nodal resource surrounding the chordal importance of #9 resolve sufficiently and the asteroid flux becomes less #10 ish(I think a tenth planet tried to form 9/2 distance (Pluto distance doubled about twenty years ago disrupting Pluto's equilibrium (as modular, disassociation, and contributed to the centri, distablishment of tension, I don't honestly believe it stopped being a planet only that quioticized it's ellipse for restructuring. Salutes to you on your question.
2007-08-06 16:06:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by Book of Changes 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes --- And I also would vote to round pi to 3.0
2007-08-06 14:59:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by KENNETH W 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I can't claim to have the intelligence that NASA does, so I'll stick with their decision.
2007-08-06 15:08:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by dvdrewinder 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
yes i would
2007-08-06 14:54:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by FFP 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
ya i would
2007-08-06 15:06:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by beth v 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
..may be....
2007-08-06 21:24:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by Tuncay U 6
·
0⤊
0⤋