English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-08-06 11:32:14 · 7 answers · asked by Vixy 1 in Sports Football (American)

7 answers

Awesome as usual, I am confused by the first answer, did you forget last year. We have no catching up to do with Denver, I believe Joe Nedney single handely put them in third place in AFC west last year. We were a playoff team last year. Did I miss the Denver playoff game last year? Honestly I think we will do about like last year, second in AFC west behind San Diego. I predict 10-6 and posible wild card as 6 seed again

2007-08-06 13:05:50 · answer #1 · answered by kcchief4l 3 · 1 0

Trent Green is gone, and you have an unproven rookie (Brody Croyle) going up against a so-so journeyman (Damon Huard).

The offensive line took a hit in the off season. And Larry Johnson is threatening to hold out for a better contract one year after getting 400+ rushes (that kind of workload might wear him down).

Tony Gonzales is still the second-highest rated tight end behind San Diego's Antonio Gates. But, without a proven QB to throw him the ball, I don't buy that.

The Chiefs also lost a couple of defensive players in the offseason. And, Donnie Edwards will only lead the league in tackles, because everybody will be penetrating into the Chiefs' secondary.

The Chiefs are not as good as Denver, but not as bad as Oakland. They'll be lucky to go 8 and 8.

2007-08-06 12:04:50 · answer #2 · answered by Paul in San Diego 7 · 0 0

KC isn't a fraud, they seem to be a very youthful team with a colourful destiny. pondering the branch, this is super that the team is finally doing sturdy. The playoffs in many situations brings out weaknesses, and KC has some, yet while i replaced right into a Chiefs fan, i could be happy the team gained the branch, and have been given into the playoffs a minimum of. next step this is build on the triumphing techniques and be extra consistent, yet i think of they are going interior the staggering course.

2016-12-11 12:16:38 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Not too good. Losing Trent Green and having to start an inexperienced, unproven quarterback and Larry Johnson threatening to holdout for a new contract into the regular season. Not a good start.

2007-08-06 11:41:33 · answer #4 · answered by Secret Asian Man 6 · 0 0

As bad as always. Actually a little worse w/out a true starting QB.

They did nothing to keep up w/or catch up w/ Denver and San Diego.

2007-08-06 11:38:57 · answer #5 · answered by soulsource7 3 · 0 0

Terrible. No QB. Head coach sucks. Top RB is pissed off. Carl Petersen is a jerk.

2007-08-06 17:52:01 · answer #6 · answered by stan l 7 · 0 0

They wont be any good this year.

2007-08-06 11:40:15 · answer #7 · answered by crash2721 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers