Just about every democrat in Congress has had it out for Bush even before they won leadership in the House.
Where has their chase taken them on trying to out Bush? Trying to out Cheney, trying to out anyone who doesn't strongly agree with them while they claim the republicans aren't sitting down to debate the issues...
Their JOB while doing this has landed them the lowest approval rating in the history of our Nation. Then they have the audacity to whine that the republicans aren't doing what the American people want.
The American people want resolution. They want our government to work together and find a solution - then put it into action. If our Country is so great why can't our government work together on even ONE issue?
Some people are ignorant enough to believe everything going on in our Country is the fault of a republican President and when things go wrong when a democrat President is in the White House, they simply attest he made a few bad choices.
EVERYONE - Presidents - Have made bad choices. Their administrations have made bad choices, their chiefs of staff, advisers, aides, etc.
What MANY people fail to admit is almost every President in current day politics has done things that could result in impeachment hearings.
Clinton had darn near a dozen impeachable acts being investigated before he even stepped into the White House. Which is exactly why he fired every single US Attorney General the moment he sat down in the Oval Office.
Don't preach about right and wrong if you don't fairly address ALL lewd or ill behaviors going on with our public officials - which regardless of what party they're affiliated with - there's just too many crooked activities going on and not holding them ALL accountable is just as bad as only holding those from one party accountable.
2007-08-06 11:41:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Where on earth do you gets your news? If anything you said in your premise is true, then Nancy Pelosi is completely inept for not beginning impeachment proceedings. Bush did not lie! Can't you get that through your thick skull? If you were told by the fire department that your house was on fire and you got everyone safely out, only to find it wasn't on fire, would you have lied to the people you led from the house? If so, you're thinking is convoluted. Being mistaken and lying are different matters entirely. Weapons of mass destruction was one of ten points for the war, not one of one. You say he's an alcoholic, yet there's no proof of that. You say he was a "C" student at best and if so, that makes him a smarter student than John Kerry was. You would better serve your own interest if you just said that you absolutely hate George Bush and let it go at that instead of appearing as foolish and uninformed as you do with this lame bit of non-sense. Hate can make people crazy and your blather points your finger right back at yourself.
2007-08-06 11:15:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
respond to VOTINGISUSELESS: the CIA sort of torture does not injury the guy in any admire. Waterboarding in simple terms drips water down the guy for under 30 seconds, yet in a roundabout way makes the guy experience like they are drowning. that's an affective gadget that in simple terms motives some soreness to the sufferer. It has worked very effectively on interrogation and it does not call for inhumane acts. additionally if Bush is undesirable then each and every of the ecu countries are undesirable. Britan France etc. all have hundreds of cameras throughout the time of their u . s . spying on their finished u . s .. additionally no bush isn't committing impeachable offenses respond to NO TO D: Andrew Jackson. He disobeyed hid duty as president. while the terrific court docket ordered that the Cherokee u . s . ought to not be relocated by using Georgia Andrew Jackson did not something to end the persons of Georgia. And interior the consititution it states that the president is had to uphold the guidelines of the form.
2016-10-09 08:53:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I never ever said NO,,,,I said ,,,,,BUSHCO has covered up and just eliminated any chance for real impeachment of lord Bush...you should know that by now,,this crap in Iraq has been going on longer than WW2.....chow freepress ,,,,P,S no crimes committed no laws broken no evidence no witnesses,,,cheer up,,,I offer you a hug,,,as its over,,,
2007-08-06 11:05:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I agree with you. I look at every pickup truck with a bush cheney sticker STILL on the bumper just to see what kind of person still supports these fools.
Usually old people with really unhappy looking faces. Just miserable people.
2007-08-06 11:10:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by nukemtwox 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Got proof? Have you been to Iraq and asked any of them if they want us there, or are you just accepting what you see on television? There is always going to be a part of any society that does not want what others do.
2007-08-06 11:00:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I didnt see the other question but I would imagine the point is... can you prove he committed an impeachable offense?
2007-08-06 10:58:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by sociald 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
The dems bullsh**ed you to get your vote. Pelosi said impeachment is not on the table.
2007-08-06 11:00:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by Tin Foil Fez 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
We don't have to protect HIM from having to answer about the deaths of those soldiers. He HAS to be held accountable.
2007-08-06 11:24:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Oh my. No, we are not on drugs. And, can you learn to express yourself without using obscenity and slurs? It would be a bit more becoming.
2007-08-06 10:58:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋