I see this as more political posturing from a doomed party. The American people see through the little games and will rectify this situation in 2008. Most citizens are having major voter remorse right now for electing in a Democratic representative. As time passes, the GOP is making huge strides forward for a clean sweep in 2008.
2007-08-06 09:00:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by mustagme 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
I think all this talk of censure and impeachment is a big waste of time. President Bush has not violated any laws that would make impeachment warranted. Merely believing the president lied is not an impeachable offense.
2007-08-06 09:00:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by Luchador 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
The democrats have been "style over substance" for a long time. They expect to get a pass for the symbolic gesture. They misread the tealeaves this time, because the far left part of their party are thirsty for blood, and a description of blood won't fool them this time.
2007-08-06 09:00:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
How can they possibly go for impeachment when there is no conviction of crime?? Just because you disagree with the President and VP is not grounds for impeachment!
2007-08-06 09:13:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
That is why we have the worst congress in history. They want to waste time on something pointless. If you want to accomplish something, bring up articles of impeachment.
2007-08-06 10:10:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by kristynshane 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's why they have a 3% favorability rating in the polls----too much politics, not enough action!
2007-08-06 08:59:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
They became smart and what is good for the country
2007-08-06 09:01:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by Scott B 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
one of over two hundred investigations. at least the dems look busy.
2007-08-06 08:59:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by BRYAN H 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
If by "typical" you mean petty and pointless, then yes.
2007-08-06 08:59:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by Lavrenti Beria 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Na...we don't want them in office because they are SOCIALISTS!
2007-08-06 09:00:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by credo quia est absurdum 7
·
0⤊
0⤋