After the fact....Yes
In all reality.....No
Mathematicians can calculate the periods in between mass extinctions of earth, to create a formula. They can say the earth is x number of years old - the first mass extinction happened in Y - The next happened in A so on and so forth. By doing this they can construct a working formula, the problem is this formula will not hold up to the next mass extinction. After the next one they could construct another working formula. We cannot foresee the future by Combining numerals. People that think we can believe in Numerology - The mystic power of numbers. The Jim Carrey movie 23 is an example of Numerology.
The problem with numerology is numbers can be deceptive. It all depends on what numerical system you use. We use the 10 base numerical system because we have 10 fingers. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10. Computers use the 2 base numerical system.
0 1 10 11 100 1001 1010 1011.....
When we change the numerical system the repetitive mathematical series changes as well. Mathematics is not only a tool it is a language. Just as my words cannot express exactly how I feel, or just as we cannot express color to a man that was born blind - Life`s events cannot be describe by the tool and language of mathematics.
2007-08-06 12:25:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by Future 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
It only appears that way to the socially conditioned. Nothing is repetitive as nothing is happening in the same way twice. No two of any natural event or 'thing' are similar in anyway other than what our society calls them. Everything in nature is random, spontaneous and unique. Society strives to create the mathematical copy of the 'perfect' sample. That is not 'life'.
2007-08-06 08:03:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by @@@@@@@@ 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Math is a tool and should be thought of as an extension of ontology. It may help us define the nature of things, but it shouldn't be thought of as a primary definition of events. You wouldn't say life was a series of hammers or a sack of nails. What sense does it make to define life in the dimensions of mathematical observation?
2007-08-06 09:00:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by ycats 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
enable's placed it this way... the essential rules of the universe as all of us be conscious of it come decrease than the two Newtonian physics or Quantum physics. all of us be conscious of for a actuality that the two are genuine and the two are the main suitable option and yet they do no longer paintings collectively. They even style of deny one yet another. this would purely recommend there is an entire realm (of physics?) which we've not stumbled on yet. The place of technology is to do away with the guff and perceive the information. as long as we carry on with the regulations technology can locate each and all of the solutions yet who is conscious the place which may lead us? we've an prolonged thank you to circulate yet however the extra we learn the swifter we detect new issues. that is style of exponential. As for magical or mathematical... while they detect its magical they are going to teach it with a mathematical formula. you be conscious of they are going to. :-D
2016-12-15 07:24:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by nations 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No all is chaos or you could take a Jungian view of things and say Synchronicity is an acasual or casual stream of events which reflect chaos in an 'ordered' matter.This is very interesting to me.PS.Dented,but no obvious dents,Madam.
2007-08-06 08:16:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by kit walker 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
No one knows, if they did then that would mean the meaning of life is the answer to a math problem.
2007-08-06 08:24:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by b j 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Im waiting for Jeeves to tell me.
2007-08-06 08:05:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by Batista 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
If it is, it's got to be trig or calculus. I only made it thru algebra1.
2007-08-06 08:08:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by thelostrose 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Basically.
2007-08-06 09:14:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋