Well, I think that's a FINE idea.
However, I believe we should be a bit more detailed about this, as long as we're going to all the trouble. I mean, alphabetically by height is fine for your run-of-the-mill anal retentive folks, but we can do better.
I suggest we sort everyone alphabetically by height by weight by eye color by NATURAL hair color by total brain volume by dvd collection size by distance from Tucumcari, New Mexico.
Oh, jeez. I think I just gave myself an aneurysm.
2007-08-06 08:09:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by bunjibear777 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Depends on whether or not fractions are counted. If not, just a short while.
5-8
5-11
5-5
5-4
5-9
5-1
5-6
5-7
5-10
5-3
5-2
5-0
Then the fours, then the sevens, then the sixes.
Anyone under 4-8 or over 7-0 does not count.
2007-08-06 19:40:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
about 3 months
2007-08-06 14:23:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by Top Contributor 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
A long time.
2007-08-06 14:25:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by sum1 w/ @n @nsw3r 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
372 days... 22 hours 16 minutes and 55 seconds.
2007-08-06 14:25:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Zero....there is no way we could do alphabetically by height. âº
2007-08-06 14:25:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by Smooch The Pooch 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Whoa there mami...Let's not think of how long. Let's us all just get together and have a P&S party!!! I'll bring the drinks! LOL
2007-08-06 14:24:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I can't think of anything clever to say, but I did give your royal highness a star.
2007-08-06 15:54:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by Steve C 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yikes,
2007-08-06 14:24:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by lifeisrandom34 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Mr Bean Van Damn is gonna teach me how to polka.
2007-08-06 15:56:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋