English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Instead of the deliberately misleading pre-constructed conservative opinion peices that they are?

And are they "cool"?
(giggling)

2007-08-06 07:01:10 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

I'd give a tooth to see an armchair conservative actually answer a question.

2007-08-06 07:06:00 · update #1

19 answers

What we can expect from any Rupert Murdock sponsored debate for Republicans:

Senator XXX: What part does religious faith play in your daily life?

Congressman YYY: Do you think we should fight the terrorist over there so we don't have to fight them over here?

Senator ZZZ: Why should republicans stand firm against the Democrat's cut and run strategy.

Whoa, Folks!! .... those questions really came out of left field!!!

2007-08-06 07:11:58 · answer #1 · answered by HillBillieNot 3 · 1 2

I am not liberal or conservative (more like a moderate conservative) and I think FOX is the most biased of all news channels. They have the most commentators that I have ever seen on the news and it is overwhelmingly conservative... that's their right but I think people are crazy if they can't admit that.

You can like Fox... I am not telling anyone that they shouldn't but the people who say that FOX is fair and balanced are fooling themselves or are just lying. MSNBC, CBS, and even CNN might be left leaning... and that's a big might... but they don't even come close to how much FOX leans right. And I have voted Republican more than Democrat but I admit this.

I miss the time when there was just one segment for commentary and the rest of the time was pure reporting... now its 80% commentary on all stations. Fox just stacks the deck and often turn the microphone off on people who show a liberal or even moderate voice.

2007-08-06 07:12:08 · answer #2 · answered by cattledog 7 · 1 1

Neil Cavuto is the most fair and balanced guy on the network. Geraldo actually is a Libertarian; and not as bad as people make him out to be.
Lou Dobbs and Brian Williams are great counter weights. I think anyone that doesn't flip thru CNN/FOX/MSNBC is going to be unable to form a fair and balanced view of whatever the subject though.

2007-08-06 07:22:40 · answer #3 · answered by from_nothing2words 1 · 1 0

Hey, " Human and Fish can co-exist peacefully " so liberals and conservatives should try it to.

There are " No right wing critics " so there are no debates at Fox News but loud liberals.

Did Rupert Murdoch debate about giving his old wife the Jewish boot ? No, he just gave it to her.

2007-08-06 07:05:59 · answer #4 · answered by The One 2 · 0 0

EDITED:

This is an email I received from Corrector:

Message: Dear Tim;
The Dems are not wasting their time with Fox's dishonest spin, as are most Americans, the REAL Q: is:

Do Republicans (amd their apologists)have the testicular fortitude to not spin at all?

A: No.

-Jim W


MY RESPONSE:

Jim,

I absolutely agree with you that Republicans spin. But if you think that Dem's do not spin, you sir are naive. Dems have their spin machines working in full force just as much as the Reps. do.

-T


Another question is:

Q. Who here thinks the democrats have the testicular fortitude to show up for a debate on Fox News?

A. No one? Interesting.


Republicans WERE willing to go to lib-land msnbc for their first debate--why were the dems too cowardly to show up at Fox?

2007-08-06 07:26:18 · answer #5 · answered by Tim H 4 · 3 1

Does the surely learn or in basic terms the mail's editorialising point out that its lady instructors. Hartley herself makes use of the interest grownup whilst the mail makes use of the inserts the interest women human beings and then notes "The learn drew no great distinction between the ideals and lecture room practices of male and lady instructors" i.e. the learn can no longer incredibly communicate for you or the mail's theory. hardly stunning that the Mail would come out with this given its aim readership. greater to the factor women human beings instructors have outnumbered male instructors long in the previous the boy disaster because of the fact the 1870s and by using 1960-eighty, without warning in 1990 this theory resurfaced. Its hardly old even though it replaced into between the principled in the back of installation the boy colleges because of the fact men have been being feminised interior the abode. in actuality her study in basic terms factors out that colleges characterise boys in a undeniable way(the place hartley says adults recommend stereotypes the mail writes women human beings urge boys to behave in female techniques-no longer the learn). additionally the researcher ability that instructors toughen and assume boys low overall performance as masculine so i do no longer think of it works alongside the argument that instructors are surpressing masculinity because of the fact the mens flow would argue. and an outstanding style of alternative study tutor that laddish behaviour is significant in figuring out antiswot attitudes as properly. whilst boys are envisioned to behave this way ladies that do are harshly criticised in accordance to study via diane ray. Its unusual that social homes do no longer exist. Em different than interior the social shape of boys underperfomance via lady instructors in accordance to you. and basically the state and girls human beings can socially build("engineer") issues no longer church homes, communities familes or friends- What a double conventional.

2016-10-14 04:27:24 · answer #6 · answered by genthner 4 · 0 0

At least Fox will allow the other side of the story to be heard even it they don't agree with it.

If you're talking about stations 'deliberately misleading pre-contructed' LIBERAL opinion pieces....why, that would be every other news station.

2007-08-06 07:09:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

The ony two shows that are really about politics and not about other news is Hannity and Colmes and The O'Reily Factor and there are debates on both. And it is tottaly cool

2007-08-06 07:07:24 · answer #8 · answered by No More Mr. Nice Guy 3 · 1 1

The only real debating that is on Faux News deals with celebrity comparisons and which commentator can bash liberals the most.

2007-08-06 07:07:31 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Haha! Nice try! But the more people watch it, the more see it as fair and balanced.

You must be a ghost - Jeremiah,lol!

I don't want your tooth.

2007-08-06 07:07:54 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers