what do we need, an elected govt.or supreme court? for everything, we ask the opininon of the highest court,then why not have only the eminent judges, and lower court for day day to day administration? any comments
2007-08-06 05:30:11 · 7 answers · asked by kurien2005 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Administration and justice must remain separated. There is nothing wrong in referring a matter to the Supreme Court and seek its opinion. There are eminent and knowledgable judges there who understand legal intricacies and can offer their valuable opinion.
If administration is transferred to the judicicary, judges might be tempted to abuse that power. E.g. A judge might have someone arrested through use of his administrative powers and then try him through use of his judicial powers. If the judge bears a grudge against that person, there is little chance of that person getting a fair trial. We must remember that humans are humans after all and hence fallible. So, the existing system should not be tampered with.
2007-08-06 05:46:12 · answer #1 · answered by Modest 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You should be thankful that there is a judiciary which has a check on the Executive. If the judiciary were to be the Executive, who would then check them if they were to get out of hand? You don't want politicians to tamper with your rights, right? The constitution has or rather we the people of India have given ourselves certain rights through a written constitution. It is the job of the judiciary to protect these rights so that the politicians don't make away with them as well. Remember the emergency or were you too young? So if the judiciary were to take over the functions of the politicians of running the country, who will guard the guards? So, if you think clearly, this state of affairs with an active judiciary and a responsible executive augurs well for the development of democracy.
2007-08-07 09:41:52 · answer #2 · answered by wind 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do you not think that we already have lower courts for the day to day administration of justice? Where have you been?
And if not an elected government, what do you suggest? If the job of king is open, where do I apply? Or maybe we're not talking about the US. I sure hope not.
2007-08-06 13:40:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Very few issues are decided by the Supreme Court -- less than a fraction of 1% of cases (at least in the US).
So, eliminating all the lower courts would increase the caseload by a thousand-fold -- which means increasing the size of the court, and you're right back where you started.
2007-08-06 12:47:25 · answer #4 · answered by coragryph 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
How about we don't go into such complex thinking and figure it out the easy way....
Lets get a dictator! He'll get a lot of things done without having to answer to anyone.
Note: I am not a communist, nor am I socialst, although differentiating between the two can be a complex matter in and of itself. I just thought it was an easy answer. *shrugs*
2007-08-06 14:07:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
it is just powering system, power flows in metal wire, the plastic cover prevent the power not leaked out until it reached its destination
here metal wire is government
plastic cover is the court.
2007-08-07 00:49:15 · answer #6 · answered by younmanofthegarden 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The situation is very complex.
2007-08-06 12:34:14 · answer #7 · answered by Devarat 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋