2007-08-06 05:01:10 · 10 answers · asked by ỉη ץ٥ڵ 5 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
I think it's a bit of both: gradual development which took occasional leaps with no specific timetable for such leaps, or for the stoppage of such leaps.
: )
2007-08-13 05:54:28 · answer #1 · answered by rockiebattles411 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Gradual development
2007-08-13 08:41:54 · answer #2 · answered by Diana 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Gradual development
2007-08-06 05:04:50 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think gradual development
2007-08-13 22:36:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You're right - there is no question that evolution WITHIN a species does in fact happen. Anyone who ever took Biology 101 surely understands that. Concrete and absolute proof abounds. There is very little room for the debate about whether one species can envolve into another, but there is SOME room remaining. Absolute proof does not exist, though considerable evidence supports this notion. Is this what you want to debate? Would the Creationist theory then be that at various points God chose to intervene to create new species, including humanity? That would presently be impossible to prove or disprove. Even without such intervention, it is certainly possible to maintain that God chose to work through the evolutionary process, unless you don't believe that God can do anything He chooses.
2016-05-19 21:52:10 · answer #5 · answered by lyndsay 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
gradual development
2007-08-14 03:52:48 · answer #6 · answered by Constantine 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
gradual development
2007-08-13 15:11:03 · answer #7 · answered by Felix 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
*gradual development*
2007-08-13 17:41:16 · answer #8 · answered by blahdeblah 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
very very gradual
2007-08-06 05:03:31 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
ok
2007-08-14 00:48:38 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋