Four days ago, I got a cat from a man who is mildly retarded.
Now he is saying he wants the cat back, but I suspect that what he really wants is money. If I offer him money for the cat and he takes it, is it legally binding? Also, should I get him to sign an agreement?
2007-08-06 00:41:40 · 12 answers · asked by Who Am I? 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
No. The person who signs a legal document should be fully aware of what he signs.
2007-08-06 00:53:25 · answer #1 · answered by Brahmanyan 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
It relies. It would be a nearby train to go into competencies tenants right into a monitoring method. Could even be a method to get your identify with the intention to assess your credit score or appear for a crook list. There's a enormous change among you delivering your identify in order that they may be able to key it right into a pc and signing your identify on an contract. Being wary and asking questions is rather clever considering that signing a agreement is a major and binding committment. Perhaps you would get a reference via a buddy to a apartment organization with first-rate status and ask them approximately the natural practices within the area. This could support you get aware of the procedure that apartment organizations use.
2016-09-05 08:38:38 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm almost tempted to give the question a star, but I won't. ROFLMAO though!
It would depend on the ideology of the magistrate or court offical you got on the day! Do you REALLY want that grief for a CAT?
FFS, If the cat is important to the guy, give it back. Hell, tell him I inherited my daughter's cat because her Mum can't have it, so he can have this little fricker too. Oh and the one that came howling at the window last night. Oh hang on a second there's an identical 20 cats wandering around in the yard ... he (or you) can have them too!
Just a little trip to Australia involved (assuming you're not here) but to be liberated from these things ... it'd be worth it!
2007-08-06 01:05:47 · answer #3 · answered by Quandary 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
First let me say I spent two minutes on the floor rolling around laughing envisioning you arguing over the finer points of a cat ownership contract with a drunken retarded person whilest you wrote out said contract.
I don't know where you live but let's assume for a minute that it is not rural bunga bunga where the naked national geographic people go around tricking impared loonies into contracual obligations.
There is no way in hell that you own the cat. Forget legally binding. On a very moral level you need to give this poor bastard his cat back. Mentally handicapted people have incredibly poor judgement & close bonds with pets.
I have no clue if this post is even a serious one. But if it is PLEASE PLEASE tell us what pray tell did you give this man for his cat if not money?
2007-08-06 00:53:47 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
If the cat is worth more than $25 you can take it to court and they will decide whether an agreement was made under duress or not.
2007-08-06 00:44:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Knock on his door with your form " I give you this cat for the sum of $10" Have him sign. Hand him the money and leave.
2007-08-06 00:53:44 · answer #6 · answered by PATRICIA MS 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Let's see, mildy retarded and drunk, binding, Yes, Libs have to agree to yahoo rules or they will get their accounts revoked, so, Yes I think.
2007-08-06 00:49:55 · answer #7 · answered by booman17 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Local shelters and the humane society are bursting with unwanted pets.
Capiche?
2007-08-06 01:03:07 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, if mental retardation is documented by a doctor.
2007-08-06 00:47:19 · answer #9 · answered by OC 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Just find another cat. It's not that hard.
2007-08-06 01:06:41 · answer #10 · answered by rkjackal02 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋