English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Which did you find better?

2007-08-05 23:44:46 · 4 answers · asked by jam 3 in Pregnancy & Parenting Pregnancy

4 answers

Both were very rewarding experiences as I brought my children into the world and got to see them for the first time. They both had their positives and negatives for me.

I had a very long labor with my vaginal (22hrs after my water broke) and a very difficult labor. What was better with that experience was after he was born the pain was gone almost instantly. But you have to go through labor which was a negative for me.

With my c-sections, the positive was I knew I would need them and I wouldn't go past 39 weeks. I knew at the latest when they would be born. The negative was it took a lot longer to heal and you feel a lot of pain after the surgery.

2007-08-05 23:51:32 · answer #1 · answered by Zahira B 3 · 1 0

I have had both natural births but alot of my friends have had c sections as well as at least 1 natural and they all say that they would rather a natural birth

2007-08-06 06:53:00 · answer #2 · answered by michelle g 1 · 0 0

Natural birth!! C section puts you out of action for about 6 weeks after! And it dammed well hurts.

2007-08-06 06:47:48 · answer #3 · answered by Sal*UK 7 · 0 0

i have had a natural birth with epidural but my sister had a c section but i swear by a natural birth but she swears that a c section is much better cause you don't have the long labour but every one is different

2007-08-06 06:48:37 · answer #4 · answered by vicky_vicstar 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers